221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16599422)
1. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications.
Holly LT; Schwender JD; Rouben DP; Foley KT
Neurosurg Focus; 2006 Mar; 20(3):E6. PubMed ID: 16599422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-indications and clinical experience.
Hari A; Krishna M; Rajagandhi S; Rajakumar DV
Neurol India; 2016; 64(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 27147152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Ahn J; Tabaraee E; Singh K
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Jul; 28(6):222-5. PubMed ID: 26079840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing miniopen and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion in single-level lumbar degeneration.
Lo WL; Lin CM; Yeh YS; Su YK; Tseng YY; Yang ST; Lin JW
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():168384. PubMed ID: 25629037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
Joseph JR; Smith BW; La Marca F; Park P
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
Tian Y; Liu X
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 26943871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center.
Wang J; Zhou Y
Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2078-84. PubMed ID: 24361997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Results and Safety Outcomes.
Lin Y; Chen W; Chen A; Li F
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 77(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 26091113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.
Lee JC; Jang HD; Shin BJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):1548-57. PubMed ID: 22426447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
Brodano GB; Martikos K; Lolli F; Gasbarrini A; Cioni A; Bandiera S; Silvestre MD; Boriani S; Greggi T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E559-64. PubMed ID: 24136060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Technical note and preliminary report on 47 cases.
Tuttle J; Shakir A; Choudhri HF
Neurosurg Focus; 2006 Mar; 20(3):E5. PubMed ID: 16599421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
