These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16599929)

  • 1. Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization.
    Danielson-François AM; Kelly JK; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):532-42. PubMed ID: 16599929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction norm variants for male calling song in populations of Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): toward a resolution of the lek paradox.
    Zhou Y; Kuster HK; Pettis JS; Danka RG; Gleason JM; Greenfield MD
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1317-34. PubMed ID: 18346222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song.
    Brandt LS; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Jul; 17(4):821-8. PubMed ID: 15271081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genotype × environment interaction, environmental heterogeneity and the lek paradox.
    Greenfield MD; Danka RG; Gleason JM; Harris BR; Zhou Y
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Apr; 25(4):601-13. PubMed ID: 22268693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17619173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of genotype, age, and social environment on male ornamentation, mating behavior, and attractiveness.
    Miller LK; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2005 Nov; 59(11):2414-25. PubMed ID: 16396182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
    Lewis Z; Wedell N; Hunt J
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2085-97. PubMed ID: 21729062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance.
    Danielson-François AM; Zhou Y; Greenfield MD
    Genetica; 2009 May; 136(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 18654830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic and environmental effects on secondary sex traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).
    Hughes KA; Rodd FH; Reznick DN
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 18(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 15669959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation.
    Garcia de Leaniz C; Fleming IA; Einum S; Verspoor E; Jordan WC; Consuegra S; Aubin-Horth N; Lajus D; Letcher BH; Youngson AF; Webb JH; Vøllestad LA; Villanueva B; Ferguson A; Quinn TP
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 May; 82(2):173-211. PubMed ID: 17437557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic architecture of sexual selection: QTL mapping of male song and female receiver traits in an acoustic moth.
    Limousin D; Streiff R; Courtois B; Dupuy V; Alem S; Greenfield MD
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44554. PubMed ID: 22957082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a Genomic Resource and Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping of Male Calling Traits in the Lesser Wax Moth, Achroia grisella.
    Gleason JM; Zhou Y; Hackett JL; Harris BR; Greenfield MD
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147014. PubMed ID: 26807910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The genetic architecture of house fly mating behavior.
    Meffert LM; Hagenbuch KL
    Curr Top Dev Biol; 2005; 66():189-213. PubMed ID: 15797454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotype by environment interactions in viability and developmental time in populations of cactophilic Drosophila.
    Fanara JJ; Folguera G; Iriarte PF; Mensch J; Hasson E
    J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):900-8. PubMed ID: 16674586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer.
    Foerster K; Coulson T; Sheldon BC; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH; Kruuk LE
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1107-10. PubMed ID: 17597758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative genetics of natural variation of behavior in Drosophila melanogaster: the possible role of the social environment on creating persistent patterns of group activity.
    Higgins LA; Jones KM; Wayne ML
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1529-39. PubMed ID: 16153038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.
    Etges WJ; de Oliveira CC; Gragg E; Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1106-19. PubMed ID: 17492965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation.
    Mills SC; Alatalo RV; Koskela E; Mappes J; Mappes T; Oksanen TA
    Evolution; 2007 Jul; 61(7):1748-57. PubMed ID: 17598753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genic capture and the genetic basis of sexually selected traits in the zebra finch.
    Birkhead TR; Pellatt EJ; Matthews IM; Roddis NJ; Hunter FM; McPhie F; Castillo-Juarez H
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2389-98. PubMed ID: 17236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.