These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16600750)
1. Evaluation of ureterointestinal anastomosis: Wallace vs Bricker. Evangelidis A; Lee EK; Karellas ME; Thrasher JB; Holzbeierlein JM J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1755-8; discussion 1758. PubMed ID: 16600750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients undergoing urinary diversion for bladder cancer. Kouba E; Sands M; Lentz A; Wallen E; Pruthi RS J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):945-8; discussion 948-9. PubMed ID: 17632159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technique selection of bricker or wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in ileal conduit urinary diversion: a strategy based on patient characteristics. Liu L; Chen M; Li Y; Wang L; Qi F; Dun J; Chen J; Zu X; Qi L Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):2808-12. PubMed ID: 24590436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of running versus interrupted anastomosis on ureterointestinal stricture rate after radical cystectomy. Large MC; Cohn JA; Kiriluk KJ; Dangle P; Richards KA; Smith ND; Steinberg GD J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):923-7. PubMed ID: 23454159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ureteroenteric strictures: a single center experience comparing Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients after urinary diversion for bladder cancer. Christoph F; Herrmann F; Werthemann P; Janik T; Schostak M; Klopf C; Weikert S BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):100. PubMed ID: 31651306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hybrid technique has lower stricture rates than Wallace and Bricker. Can O; Danış E; Kutlutürk EG; Polat EC; Ötünçtemur A Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 52():102036. PubMed ID: 38198985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Surgical techniques for the ureterointestinal anastomosis in continent urinary diversion]. Lü J; He HX; Hu WL; Cheng XH; Nie HB; Li QR; Wang YL; Deng ZX; Cao QY; Wang W; Zhu YS; Tan SH; Liang WB Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Sep; 41(9):670-2. PubMed ID: 14680566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the incidence of uretero-intestinal anastomotic stricture increased in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with previous pelvic radiation? Katkoori D; Samavedi S; Adiyat KT; Soloway MS; Manoharan M BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(6):795-8. PubMed ID: 19725823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of Bricker versus Wallace ureteroenteric anastomosis and identification of predictors for postoperative ureteroenteric stricture. Krafft U; Mahmoud O; Hess J; Radtke JP; Panic A; Püllen L; Darr C; Kesch C; Szarvas T; Rehme C; Hadaschik BA; Tschirdewahn S Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 May; 407(3):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 34940890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis. Al-Nader M; Krafft U; Hess J; Kesch C; AbdelRazek M; Abolyosr A; Alsagheer GA; Mohamed O; Fathi A; Tschirdewahn S; Hadaschik BA; Mahmoud O Int J Urol; 2024 Jul; 31(7):813-818. PubMed ID: 38644653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of modified Taguchi and Bricker ureteral reimplantation techniques after radical cystectomy. Lee CT; Chen BT; Gong E; Hafez KS; Sheffield JH; Montie JE Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):940-4. PubMed ID: 15533482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bricker versus Wallace anastomosis: A meta-analysis of ureteroenteric stricture rates after ileal conduit urinary diversion. Davis NF; Burke JP; McDermott T; Flynn R; Manecksha RP; Thornhill JA Can Urol Assoc J; 2015; 9(5-6):E284-90. PubMed ID: 26029296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ureteroileal anastomotic strictures after a Bricker ileal conduit: 50 case assessment of the impact of conversion from a slit incision to a "shield shaped" ileotomy. Cheng M; Looney SW; Brown JA Can J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(2):5644-9. PubMed ID: 21504654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endoscopic treatment of non-malignant ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures following urinary diversion. Hu W; Su B; Xiao B; Zhang X; Chen S; Tang Y; Liu Y; Fu M; Li J BMC Urol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):61. PubMed ID: 28789635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Forming of straight urointestinal anastomosis at enteric replacement of urinary bladder]. Darenkov SP; Ochcharkhadzhiev SB Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2008; (11):67-70. PubMed ID: 19301499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after radical cystectomy-does operative approach matter? Anderson CB; Morgan TM; Kappa S; Moore D; Clark PE; Davis R; Penson DF; Barocas DA; Smith JA; Cookson MS; Chang SS J Urol; 2013 Feb; 189(2):541-7. PubMed ID: 23260561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Refluxing chimney versus nonrefluxing LeDuc ureteroileal anastomosis for orthotopic ileal neobladder: a comparative analysis for patients with bladder cancer. Hautmann S; Chun KH; Currlin E; Braun P; Huland H; Juenemann KP J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1389-93; discussion 1393-4. PubMed ID: 16516005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technique selection of ureteroileal anastomosis in hautmann ileal neobladder with chimney modification: Reliability of patient-based selection strategy and its impact on ureteroentric stricture rate. Djordjevic D; Dragicevic S; Vukovic M Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2021 Sep; 93(3):262-267. PubMed ID: 34839626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of Uretero-ileal Anastomosis in Bladder Cancer Cystectomies: Bricker vs. Wallace 1. Adnan S; Abu Bakar M; Khalil MAI; Fiaz S; Ahmad Cheema Z; Ali A; Mir K Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e22782. PubMed ID: 35382195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Ways to improve the quality of life of elderly and senile patients after the operation by Brikker]. Roman LD; Vasil'ev LA; Shestaev AIu; Kheĭfets VKh; Kostiuk IP; Shostka KG; Pavlenko AN; Krest'ianinov SS; Kagan OF Adv Gerontol; 2011; 24(4):668-73. PubMed ID: 22550877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]