226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16600750)
1. Evaluation of ureterointestinal anastomosis: Wallace vs Bricker.
Evangelidis A; Lee EK; Karellas ME; Thrasher JB; Holzbeierlein JM
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1755-8; discussion 1758. PubMed ID: 16600750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients undergoing urinary diversion for bladder cancer.
Kouba E; Sands M; Lentz A; Wallen E; Pruthi RS
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):945-8; discussion 948-9. PubMed ID: 17632159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technique selection of bricker or wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in ileal conduit urinary diversion: a strategy based on patient characteristics.
Liu L; Chen M; Li Y; Wang L; Qi F; Dun J; Chen J; Zu X; Qi L
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):2808-12. PubMed ID: 24590436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of running versus interrupted anastomosis on ureterointestinal stricture rate after radical cystectomy.
Large MC; Cohn JA; Kiriluk KJ; Dangle P; Richards KA; Smith ND; Steinberg GD
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):923-7. PubMed ID: 23454159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ureteroenteric strictures: a single center experience comparing Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients after urinary diversion for bladder cancer.
Christoph F; Herrmann F; Werthemann P; Janik T; Schostak M; Klopf C; Weikert S
BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):100. PubMed ID: 31651306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hybrid technique has lower stricture rates than Wallace and Bricker.
Can O; Danış E; Kutlutürk EG; Polat EC; Ötünçtemur A
Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 52():102036. PubMed ID: 38198985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Surgical techniques for the ureterointestinal anastomosis in continent urinary diversion].
Lü J; He HX; Hu WL; Cheng XH; Nie HB; Li QR; Wang YL; Deng ZX; Cao QY; Wang W; Zhu YS; Tan SH; Liang WB
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Sep; 41(9):670-2. PubMed ID: 14680566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the incidence of uretero-intestinal anastomotic stricture increased in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with previous pelvic radiation?
Katkoori D; Samavedi S; Adiyat KT; Soloway MS; Manoharan M
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(6):795-8. PubMed ID: 19725823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of Bricker versus Wallace ureteroenteric anastomosis and identification of predictors for postoperative ureteroenteric stricture.
Krafft U; Mahmoud O; Hess J; Radtke JP; Panic A; Püllen L; Darr C; Kesch C; Szarvas T; Rehme C; Hadaschik BA; Tschirdewahn S
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 May; 407(3):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 34940890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of modified Taguchi and Bricker ureteral reimplantation techniques after radical cystectomy.
Lee CT; Chen BT; Gong E; Hafez KS; Sheffield JH; Montie JE
Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):940-4. PubMed ID: 15533482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bricker versus Wallace anastomosis: A meta-analysis of ureteroenteric stricture rates after ileal conduit urinary diversion.
Davis NF; Burke JP; McDermott T; Flynn R; Manecksha RP; Thornhill JA
Can Urol Assoc J; 2015; 9(5-6):E284-90. PubMed ID: 26029296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ureteroileal anastomotic strictures after a Bricker ileal conduit: 50 case assessment of the impact of conversion from a slit incision to a "shield shaped" ileotomy.
Cheng M; Looney SW; Brown JA
Can J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(2):5644-9. PubMed ID: 21504654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endoscopic treatment of non-malignant ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures following urinary diversion.
Hu W; Su B; Xiao B; Zhang X; Chen S; Tang Y; Liu Y; Fu M; Li J
BMC Urol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):61. PubMed ID: 28789635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Forming of straight urointestinal anastomosis at enteric replacement of urinary bladder].
Darenkov SP; Ochcharkhadzhiev SB
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2008; (11):67-70. PubMed ID: 19301499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after radical cystectomy-does operative approach matter?
Anderson CB; Morgan TM; Kappa S; Moore D; Clark PE; Davis R; Penson DF; Barocas DA; Smith JA; Cookson MS; Chang SS
J Urol; 2013 Feb; 189(2):541-7. PubMed ID: 23260561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Refluxing chimney versus nonrefluxing LeDuc ureteroileal anastomosis for orthotopic ileal neobladder: a comparative analysis for patients with bladder cancer.
Hautmann S; Chun KH; Currlin E; Braun P; Huland H; Juenemann KP
J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1389-93; discussion 1393-4. PubMed ID: 16516005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technique selection of ureteroileal anastomosis in hautmann ileal neobladder with chimney modification: Reliability of patient-based selection strategy and its impact on ureteroentric stricture rate.
Djordjevic D; Dragicevic S; Vukovic M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2021 Sep; 93(3):262-267. PubMed ID: 34839626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of Uretero-ileal Anastomosis in Bladder Cancer Cystectomies: Bricker vs. Wallace 1.
Adnan S; Abu Bakar M; Khalil MAI; Fiaz S; Ahmad Cheema Z; Ali A; Mir K
Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e22782. PubMed ID: 35382195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Ways to improve the quality of life of elderly and senile patients after the operation by Brikker].
Roman LD; Vasil'ev LA; Shestaev AIu; Kheĭfets VKh; Kostiuk IP; Shostka KG; Pavlenko AN; Krest'ianinov SS; Kagan OF
Adv Gerontol; 2011; 24(4):668-73. PubMed ID: 22550877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Open surgical repair of ureteral strictures and fistulas following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.
Msezane L; Reynolds WS; Mhapsekar R; Gerber G; Steinberg G
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1428-31. PubMed ID: 18289599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
