These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16601999)

  • 1. Effect of digital radiography on emergency department radiographic examinations.
    Lee B; Junewick J; Luttenton C
    Emerg Radiol; 2006 May; 12(4):158-9. PubMed ID: 16601999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment.
    Andriole KP; Luth DM; Gould RG
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():124-6. PubMed ID: 12105711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of film-screen, CR and DR: a community hospital time-motion study.
    Mehta M; Lee T
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 14699926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program.
    Heddson B; Rönnow K; Olsson M; Miller D
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 17383841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Workflow improvement and efficiency gain with near total digitalization of a radiology department].
    Langen HL; Bielmeier J; Wittenberg G; Selbach R; Feustel H
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1309-16. PubMed ID: 14556098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
    Aldrich JE; Duran E; Dunlop P; Mayo JR
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16511674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Walcher M; Pohl M; Jaschke W
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 10525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital radiography of the musculoskeletal system: the optimal image.
    Freedman M; Steller D
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):37-42. PubMed ID: 7734538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and hard copy of computed radiography in full and two-thirds sizes in detection of interstitial lung disease.
    Kondoh H; Ikezoe J; Inamura K; Kuroda C; Kozuka T
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Nov; 7(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 7858016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):343-50. PubMed ID: 15789578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital chest radiography: clinical aspects.
    Tylén U
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7734532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of a digital radiography system.
    Lai KW; Langlois SL
    Australas Radiol; 1999 May; 43(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 10901901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Selenium-based digital radiography of the cervical spine: comparison with screen-film radiography for the depiction of anatomic details].
    Ludwig K; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Link TM; Lenzen H; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):1028-32. PubMed ID: 12142983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Lung imaging in intensive medicine. A comparison of digital storage-screen imaging and conventional film-screen imaging].
    Busch HP; Winter-Nossek A; Bethke U; Kohler P; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 2160100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conventional vs computed radiography: evaluation of myelography.
    Yang PJ; Seeley GW; Carmody RF; Seeger JF; Yoshino MT; Mockbee B
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1988; 9(1):165-8. PubMed ID: 3124568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel, portable, cassette-sized, and wireless flat-panel digital radiography system: initial workflow results versus computed radiography.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Ackermann H; Schomerus C; Jacobi V; Balzer JO; Vogl TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1368-71. PubMed ID: 21606301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital radiography. Cost-benefit analysis].
    Braunschweig R; Pistitsch C; Nissen-Meyer S
    Radiologe; 1996 Apr; 36(4):306-14. PubMed ID: 8677323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased productivity of a digital imaging system: one hospital's experience.
    Sack D
    Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(6):14-8. PubMed ID: 11793559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.