These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16602303)

  • 1. The length of growing season and adult sex ratio affect sexual size dimorphism in moose.
    Garel M; Solberg EJ; Saether BE; Herfindal I; Høgda KA
    Ecology; 2006 Mar; 87(3):745-58. PubMed ID: 16602303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer.
    Post E; Langvatn R; Forchhammer MC; Stenseth NC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1999 Apr; 96(8):4467-71. PubMed ID: 10200285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extrinsic factors affecting cub development contribute to sexual size dimorphism in the European badger (Meles meles).
    Sugianto NA; Newman C; Macdonald DW; Buesching CD
    Zoology (Jena); 2019 Aug; 135():125688. PubMed ID: 31383294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of spermatozoa and reproductive organs in relation to age and body weight in Swedish moose (Alces alces).
    Malmsten J; Söderquist L; Thulin CG; Dalin AM
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2015 Feb; 153():76-86. PubMed ID: 25576030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpopulation Comparison of Sex-Biased Mortality and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Sea-Run Masu Salmon, Oncorhynchus masou.
    Tamate T
    Zoolog Sci; 2015 Aug; 32(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 26245223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different paths to sexual size dimorphism in two praying mantids, Pseudomantis albofimbriata and Hierodula majuscula.
    Allen LE; Barry KL; Holwell GI
    Insect Sci; 2014 Apr; 21(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 23956112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population characteristics predict responses in moose body mass to temporal variation in the environment.
    Herfindal I; Saether BE; Solberg EJ; Andersen R; Høgda KA
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Sep; 75(5):1110-8. PubMed ID: 16922846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of sexual dimorphism in body size and mouth morphology on diet selection and sexual segregation in cervids.
    Pérez-Barbería FJ; Gordon IJ
    Acta Vet Hung; 1998; 46(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 9704534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A test of the reproductive cost hypothesis for sexual size dimorphism in Yarrow's spiny lizard Sceloporus jarrovii.
    Cox RM
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Nov; 75(6):1361-9. PubMed ID: 17032368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moose body mass variation revisited: disentangling effects of environmental conditions and genetics.
    Herfindal I; Haanes H; Solberg EJ; Røed KH; Høgda KA; Sæther BE
    Oecologia; 2014 Feb; 174(2):447-58. PubMed ID: 24091427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of age, sex and density on body weight of Norwegian red deer: evidence of density-dependent senescence.
    Mysterud A; Yoccoz NG; Stenseth NC; Langvatn R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 May; 268(1470):911-9. PubMed ID: 11370963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex-specific selection and intraspecific variation in sexual size dimorphism.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Evolution; 2010 Mar; 64(3):798-809. PubMed ID: 19796147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rainfall decrease and red deer rutting behaviour: Weaker and delayed rutting activity though higher opportunity for sexual selection.
    F Millán M; Carranza J; Pérez-González J; Valencia J; Torres-Porras J; Seoane JM; de la Peña E; Alarcos S; Sánchez-Prieto CB; Castillo L; Flores A; Membrillo A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244802. PubMed ID: 33471796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations.
    Kjellander P; Gaillard JM; Hewison AJ
    Oecologia; 2006 Jan; 146(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 16341553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Negative density-dependent emigration of males in an increasing red deer population.
    Loe LE; Mysterud A; Veiberg V; Langvatn R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Jul; 276(1667):2581-7. PubMed ID: 19364736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male group size, female distribution and changes in sexual segregation by Roosevelt elk.
    Peterson LM; Weckerly FW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187829. PubMed ID: 29121076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Macroecological patterns of sexual size dimorphism in turtles of the world.
    Agha M; Ennen JR; Nowakowski AJ; Lovich JE; Sweat SC; Todd BD
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Mar; 31(3):336-345. PubMed ID: 29240975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lack of support for Rensch's rule in an intraspecific test using red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) populations.
    Martin OY; Michalczyk Ł; Millard AL; Emerson BC; Gage MJ
    Insect Sci; 2017 Feb; 24(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 26299521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer.
    Clutton-Brock TH; Rose KE; Guinness FE
    Proc Biol Sci; 1997 Oct; 264(1387):1509-16. PubMed ID: 9364790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ontogenic sources of variation in sexual size dimorphism in a viviparous lizard.
    Le Galliard JF; Massot M; Landys MM; Meylan S; Clobert J
    J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):690-704. PubMed ID: 16674566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.