These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16602377)

  • 1. Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves.
    Johnson MW; Bickel WK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 16602377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of measures of relative reinforcing efficacy and behavioral economics: cigarettes and money in smokers.
    Bickel WK; Madden GJ
    Behav Pharmacol; 1999 Nov; 10(6-7):627-37. PubMed ID: 10780504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of nicotine-containing and de-nicotinized cigarette consumption to alternative non-drug reinforcement: a behavioral economic analysis.
    Shahan TA; Bickel WK; Badger GJ; Giordano LA
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Jul; 12(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 11548113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy: economic substitutes.
    Madden GJ; Smethells JR; Ewan EE; Hursh SR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Mar; 87(2):219-40. PubMed ID: 17465313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Behavioral economics of human drug self-administration: progressive ratio versus random sequences of response requirements.
    Giordano LA; Bickel WK; Shahan TA; Badger GJ
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Sep; 12(5):343-7. PubMed ID: 11710749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the reinforcing efficacy of nicotine containing and de-nicotinized cigarettes: a behavioral economic analysis.
    Shahan TA; Bickel WK; Madden GJ; Badger GJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Nov; 147(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 10591889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A behavioral economic analysis of concurrently available money and cigarettes.
    DeGrandpre RJ; Bickel WK; Higgins ST; Hughes JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Mar; 61(2):191-201. PubMed ID: 8169568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal.
    Bickel WK; Marsch LA; Carroll ME
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Dec; 153(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11255928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of progressive ratio schedules versus behavioral economic measures: effect of an alternative reinforcer on the reinforcing efficacy of phencyclidine.
    Rodefer JS; Carroll ME
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Jul; 132(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 9272765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pigeons' demand and preference for specific and generalized conditioned reinforcers in a token economy.
    Tan L; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):296-314. PubMed ID: 26676183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy II: economic complements.
    Madden GJ; Smethells JR; Ewan EE; Hursh SR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Nov; 88(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 18047226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The behavioral economics of cigarette smoking: The concurrent presence of a substitute and an independent reinforcer.
    Johnson MW; Bickel WK
    Behav Pharmacol; 2003 Mar; 14(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 12658074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Demand equations for qualitatively different foods under fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of three data conversions.
    Foster TM; Sumpter CE; Temple W; Flevill A; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Nov; 92(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 20514164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of reinforcer magnitude and nicotine amount on smoking's acute reinforcement enhancing effects.
    Perkins KA; Karelitz JL
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Nov; 133(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 23768842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A questionnaire approach to measuring the relative reinforcing efficacy of snack foods.
    Epstein LH; Dearing KK; Roba LG
    Eat Behav; 2010 Apr; 11(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 20188288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive Validity of a Cigarette Purchase Task in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Contingent Vouchers for Smoking in Individuals With Substance Use Disorders.
    Mackillop J; Murphy CM; Martin RA; Stojek M; Tidey JW; Colby SM; Rohsenow DJ
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2016 May; 18(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 26498173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A steady-state test of the demand curve analysis of relative reinforcer efficacy.
    Madden GJ; Hartman EC
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Feb; 14(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 16503707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methadone and nicotine self-administration in humans: a behavioral economic analysis.
    Spiga R; Martinetti MP; Meisch RA; Cowan K; Hursh S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 Mar; 178(2-3):223-31. PubMed ID: 15526094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative reinforcing efficacy of cigarettes as a predictor of smoking abstinence among treatment-seeking smokers.
    Secades-Villa R; Pericot-Valverde I; Weidberg S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Sep; 233(17):3103-12. PubMed ID: 27325392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.