These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16602567)

  • 1. Motor unit conduction velocity distribution estimation from evoked motor responses.
    Ledoux I; García-González MT; Duchêne J; Hogrel JY
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):608-16. PubMed ID: 16602567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of motor unit conduction velocity from surface EMG recordings by signal-based selection of the spatial filters.
    Mesin L; Tizzani F; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1963-71. PubMed ID: 17019860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel approach for estimating muscle fiber conduction velocity by spatial and temporal filtering of surface EMG signals.
    Farina D; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Dec; 50(12):1340-51. PubMed ID: 14656063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of muscle fiber conduction velocity with a spectral multidip approach.
    Farina D; Negro F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1583-9. PubMed ID: 17867350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cross-correlation and phase-difference methods are not equivalent under noninvasive estimation of the motor unit propagation velocity.
    Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Dimitrova NA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 15094143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A technique to track individual motor unit action potentials in surface EMG by monitoring their conduction velocities and amplitudes.
    Beck RB; Houtman CJ; O'Malley MJ; Lowery MM; Stegeman DF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):622-9. PubMed ID: 15825864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deconvolution estimation of motor unit conduction velocity distribution.
    González-Cueto JA; Parker PA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):955-62. PubMed ID: 12214885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of muscle-fiber velocity recovery function on motor unit action potential properties in voluntary contractions.
    Farina D; Falla D
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 May; 37(5):650-8. PubMed ID: 18085714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The recruitment order of electrically activated motor neurons investigated with a novel collision technique.
    Hennings K; Kamavuako EN; Farina D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):283-91. PubMed ID: 17174598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulations of motor unit number estimation techniques.
    Major LA; Jones KE
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Jun; 2(2):17-34. PubMed ID: 15928409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new method for the estimation of motor nerve conduction block.
    Mesin L; Cocito D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):730-40. PubMed ID: 17317295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the utility and limitations of counting motor unit action potentials in the surface electromyogram.
    Zhou P; Rymer WZ
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Dec; 1(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 15876644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can standard surface EMG processing parameters be used to estimate motor unit global firing rate?
    Zhou P; Rymer WZ
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Jun; 1(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 15876628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from two-dimensional surface EMG recordings.
    Farina D; Merletti R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Apr; 134(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 15003386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of the muscle fibre semi-length under varying joint positions on the basis of non-invasively extracted motor unit action potentials.
    Schulte E; Dimitrova NA; Dimitrov GV; Rau G; Disselhorst-Klug C
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Jun; 15(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 15763676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials.
    Ferdjallah M; Wertsch JJ; Harris GF
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling of muscle motor unit innervation process correlation and common drive.
    Jiang N; Parker PA; Englehart KB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1605-14. PubMed ID: 16916095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conduction velocity of quiescent muscle fibers decreases during sustained contraction.
    Gazzoni M; Camelia F; Farina D
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):387-94. PubMed ID: 15703224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oscillations in the power spectra of motor unit signals caused by refractoriness variations.
    Hu XL; Tong KY; Hung LK
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Sep; 1(3):174-85. PubMed ID: 15876637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of estimated muscle fiber conduction velocity with the normalized peak-averaging technique.
    Nishihara K; Futami T; Hosoda K; Gomi T
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Feb; 15(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 15642657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.