These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16603403)
1. [Elective single embryo transfer: a justified policy for selected patients]. Giorgetti C; Chabert-Orsini V; Barry B; Chinchole JM; Franquebalme JP; Hans E; Glowaczower E; Terriou P; Sitri MC; Salzmann J; Thibault MC; Roulier R Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Apr; 34(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 16603403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers. Fauque P; Jouannet P; Davy C; Guibert J; Viallon V; Epelboin S; Kunstmann JM; Patrat C Fertil Steril; 2010 Aug; 94(3):927-35. PubMed ID: 19446806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elective transfer of single fresh blastocysts and later transfer of cryostored blastocysts reduces the twin pregnancy rate and can improve the in vitro fertilization live birth rate in younger women. Henman M; Catt JW; Wood T; Bowman MC; de Boer KA; Jansen RP Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1620-7. PubMed ID: 16359955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [How to improve ART results? Is France behind other countries? Strategy for single embryo transfer: The value of embryo selection and embryo freezing]. Terriou P; Giorgetti C; Hans E; Salzmann J; Charles O; Cignetti L; Avon C; Roulier R Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):786-92. PubMed ID: 16950642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Janssen JM; Derhaag JG; Dirksen CD; Dunselman GA; Land JA; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC Hum Reprod; 2006 Feb; 21(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 16253973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Gerris J; De Sutter P; De Neubourg D; Van Royen E; Vander Elst J; Mangelschots K; Vercruyssen M; Kok P; Elseviers M; Annemans L; Pauwels P; Dhont M Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 14990547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What about the remaining twins since single-embryo transfer? How far can (should) we go? De Neubourg D; Gerris J Hum Reprod; 2006 Apr; 21(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 16410338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples. Van Peperstraten AM; Kreuwel IA; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Van Dop PA; Grol RP; Kremer JA Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 18231893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal. Gerris JM Hum Reprod Update; 2005; 11(2):105-21. PubMed ID: 15514015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles. van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Coonen E; Derhaag JG; Evers JL Hum Reprod; 2005 Feb; 20(2):433-6. PubMed ID: 15550492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Establishment of criteria for elective single embryo transfer at day 2 or day 3 by analyzing cases with successful implantation of all embryos transferred. Shibahara H; Hirano Y; Okajima T; Shimada K; Kikuchi K; Suzuki T; Takamizawa S; Suzuki M J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Aug; 33(4):501-5. PubMed ID: 17688618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology]. Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Cadoret V; Jamet C; Royere D Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19218575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years. Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing the multiple pregnancy rate in ART. Bowman M J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S132-5. PubMed ID: 21213510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reducing twin pregnancy rates after IVF--elective single embryo transfer (eSET). Milne P; Cottell E; Allen C; Spillane H; Vasallo J; Wingfield M Ir Med J; 2010 Jan; 103(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 20222385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Day 2 elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice: better outcome in ICSI cycles. Martikainen H; Orava M; Lakkakorpi J; Tuomivaara L Hum Reprod; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1364-6. PubMed ID: 15105390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single embryo transfer in clinical practice. Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A Hum Fertil (Camb); 2004 Sep; 7(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 15590571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years. Veleva Z; Vilska S; Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2098-102. PubMed ID: 16740524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]