These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16604733)
21. Mandatory HIV testing of new-borns in the United States. Parizer KL Biomed Ethics; 1999; 4(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 11759725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose. Berkowitz JF J Crim Law Criminol; 2001; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights. Schehr AR Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies. Cherry AL Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. It takes two, baby: fathers, the tort of conversion, and its application to the abortion of pre-viability fetuses. Pahl MR Whittier Law Rev; 2002; 24(1):221-51. PubMed ID: 15156892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Conflicts between protecting and respecting women: the prohibition of sex-selected birth. Dickens BM Hum Health Care Int; 1997; 13(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 16729411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution. Tweedt DE Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Statement by the Honorable John M. Murphy accompanying his introduction of a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment on human life. Murphy JM Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1976 May; 122(66):E2405-6. PubMed ID: 11663666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns. Shultz MM South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reply to Sarah Burns. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Fetal pain legislation. Subordinating sound medical findings to moral and political agendas. Wenger AA J Leg Med; 2006 Dec; 27(4):459-76. PubMed ID: 17162682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Consent and marital status--the legalities. Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1986 Jun; 4(3):19-20. PubMed ID: 3639758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Goodbye to the Judeo-Christian era in law. Byrn RM America (NY); 1973 Jun; 128(21):511-4. PubMed ID: 11664251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Whose rights supersede, those of the patient or those of the unborn fetus? Cady RF JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 1999 Mar; 1(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10823985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Senate Joint Resolutions 14 and 15 proposing constitutional amendments for the protection of the unborn. Garn J Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Jan; 123(12):S1234-7. PubMed ID: 11663753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]