BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16606743)

  • 1. Short communication: Comparison of protocols to estimate twenty-four-hour fat and protein percentages for herds with a robotic milking system.
    Hand KJ; Lazenby D; Miglior F; Kelton DF
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 May; 89(5):1723-6. PubMed ID: 16606743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating daily fat yield from a single milking on test day for herds with a robotic milking system.
    Peeters R; Galesloot PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 11949875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic parameters of milking frequency and milk production traits in Canadian Holsteins milked by an automated milking system.
    Nixon M; Bohmanova J; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Hand K; Miglior F
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3422-30. PubMed ID: 19528620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the sampling device on fat and protein variation in cow milk samples obtained for official milk recording.
    Fouz R; Yus E; Sanjuán ML; Diéguez FJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):4914-8. PubMed ID: 19762807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shorter sampling periods and accurate estimates of milk volume and components are possible for pasture based dairy herds milked with automated milking systems.
    Kamphuis C; Burke JK; Taukiri S; Petch SF; Turner SA
    J Dairy Res; 2016 Aug; 83(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 27600967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systems comparison of once- versus twice-daily milking of pastured dairy cows.
    Clark DA; Phyn CV; Tong MJ; Collis SJ; Dalley DE
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 May; 89(5):1854-62. PubMed ID: 16606757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of simplified sampling procedures for estimating milk composition in dairy ewes.
    Othmane MH; Angel Fuertes J; Gonzalo C; De La Fuente LF; Primitivo FS
    J Dairy Res; 2006 Feb; 73(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 16433969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field validation of a milk-line sampling device for monitoring milk component data.
    Godden S; Bey R; Reneau J; Farnsworth R; LaValle M
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Sep; 85(9):2192-6. PubMed ID: 12362451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Yields and persistency of lactation in Friesian and Jersey cows milked once daily.
    Hickson RE; Lopez-Villalobos N; Dalley DE; Clark DA; Holmes CW
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jun; 89(6):2017-24. PubMed ID: 16702265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of length of dry period on yields of milk fat and protein, fertility and milk somatic cell score in the subsequent lactation of dairy cows.
    Kuhn MT; L Hutchison J; Norman HD
    J Dairy Res; 2006 May; 73(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 16476176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Milking-to-milking variability for milk yield, fat and protein percentage, and somatic cell count.
    Quist MA; LeBlanc SJ; Hand KJ; Lazenby D; Miglior F; Kelton DF
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3412-23. PubMed ID: 18765600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longer milking intervals alter mammary epithelial permeability and the Udder's ability to extract nutrients.
    Delamaire E; Guinard-Flament J
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jun; 89(6):2007-16. PubMed ID: 16702264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Milk coagulation ability of five dairy cattle breeds.
    De Marchi M; Dal Zotto R; Cassandro M; Bittante G
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3986-92. PubMed ID: 17639010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Production loss due to new subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy cows estimated with a test-day model.
    Halasa T; Nielen M; De Roos AP; Van Hoorne R; de Jong G; Lam TJ; van Werven T; Hogeveen H
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):599-606. PubMed ID: 19164670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of increasing milking frequency during the last 28 days of gestation on milk production, dry matter intake, and energy balance in dairy cows.
    Rastani RR; Del Rio NS; Gressley TF; Dahl GE; Grummer RR
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1729-39. PubMed ID: 17369213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Udder health of cows changing from tie stalls or free stalls with conventional milking to free stalls with either conventional or automatic milking.
    Hovinen M; Rasmussen MD; Pyörälä S
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):3696-703. PubMed ID: 19620651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized herd-level field study of dietary interactions with monensin on milk fat percentage in dairy cows.
    Dubuc J; DuTremblay D; Brodeur M; Duffield T; Bagg R; Baril J; DesCôteaux L
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):777-81. PubMed ID: 19164691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the use of milk composition measures to predict the energy balance of dairy cows.
    Friggens NC; Ridder C; Løvendahl P
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Dec; 90(12):5453-67. PubMed ID: 18024736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.