These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16607875)

  • 21. A case against routine computed tomography imaging of the dental alveolus before implant placement.
    Pieper SP; Lewis SG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 59(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 11152192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sinus lift procedure of the maxilla in patients with inadequate bone for dental implants: radiographic appearance.
    Abrahams JJ; Hayt MW; Rock R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 May; 174(5):1289-92. PubMed ID: 10789779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Early implant placement in bilateral sinus floor augmentation using iliac bone block grafts in severe maxillary atrophy: a clinical, histological, and radiographic case report.
    Acocella A; Sacco R; Niardi P; Agostini T
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 19288886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implant imaging. Status, controversies, and new developments.
    Reiskin AB
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 9421669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Denta Scan: CT software program used in the anatomic evaluation of the mandible and maxilla in the perspective of endosseous implant surgery.
    Casselman JW; Deryckere F; Hermans R; Declercq C; Neyt L; Pattyn G; Meeus L; Vandevoorde P; Steyaert L; Devos V
    Rofo; 1991 Jul; 155(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 1854934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computed tomography in the preoperative planning of oral endo-osseous implant surgery.
    Lamoral Y; Quirynen M; Peene P; Vanneste F; Lemahieu SF; Baert AL; van Steenberghe D
    Rofo; 1990 Nov; 153(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 2173053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
    Tal H; Moses O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study.
    Ikumi N; Tsutsumi S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 15839119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-guided implant placement in a patient with severe atrophy.
    Peñarrocha M; Boronat A; Carrillo C; Albalat S
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 18780565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites.
    Hatcher DC; Dial C; Mayorga C
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 31(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 14696834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery.
    Schwarz MS; Rothman SL; Chafetz N; Rhodes M
    Dent Clin North Am; 1989 Oct; 33(4):555-97. PubMed ID: 2680653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
    Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone anatomy for implantation--a survey of 374 patients.
    Juodzbalys G; Raustia AM
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 15008452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
    Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography for planning dental implant therapy.
    Luk LC; Pow EH; Li TK; Chow TW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 21365040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CT scan standard reconstruction technique for reliable jaw bone volume determination.
    Quirynen M; Lamoral Y; Dekeyser C; Peene P; van Steenberghe D; Bonte J; Baert AL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 2094657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and a combination of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone: a 2-year prospective study.
    Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Fini M; Aldini NN; Giardino R; Marchetti C
    J Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):2093-103. PubMed ID: 18980518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.