182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16608054)
21. Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
Shan J; Tucker AW; Gaalaas LR; Wu G; Platin E; Mol A; Lu J; Zhou O
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150098. PubMed ID: 26090933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Updated quality assurance self-assessment exercise in intraoral and panoramic radiography. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Radiology Practice Committee.
Goren AD; Lundeen RC; Deahl ST; Hashimoto K; Kapa SF; Katz JO; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Van Der Stelt PF; Wolfgang L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10710465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique.
Geelen W; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Kruger M; Hansson LG
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 9699411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How to improve digital dental radiograph reproducibility: an individualized technique.
Muratore F; Tripodi D; Teté S; de Fazio P; Festa F
Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Apr; 4(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11692661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of intraoral image artifacts related to photostimulable phosphor plates in a dentomaxillofacial radiology department.
Gulsahi A; Secgin CK
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 26856290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Discovering the ClikRay system.
Schmulenson HK
Alpha Omegan; 2006; 99(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 17216766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient discomfort in bitewing examination with film and four digital receptors.
Jørgensen PM; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 May; 41(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 22517998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Simulation of three intraoral radiographic techniques in pediatric dental patients: subjective comfort assessment using the VAS and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Raiting Scale.
Ozdemir S; Parlakyıldız Gokce A; Unver T
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):33. PubMed ID: 32005154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors.
Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 2: the influence of intra-oral image receptor on periodontal measurements.
Vandenberghe B; Bosmans H; Yang J; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 20461423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiation dose-reduction techniques in North American dental schools.
Geist JR; Katz JO
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Apr; 93(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 12029291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography.
Hildebolt CF; Couture RA; Whiting BR
Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):273-97, vi. PubMed ID: 10740769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient discomfort and retakes in periapical examination of mandibular third molars using digital receptors and film.
Matzen LH; Christensen J; Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):566-72. PubMed ID: 19121963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Phosphor plate radiography: an integral component of the filmless practice.
Benjamin S
Dent Today; 2010 Nov; 29(11):89. PubMed ID: 21133024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
