These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16608808)

  • 1. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
    Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
    Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
    Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study.
    Izamin I; Aniza I; Rizal AM; Aljunid SM
    Med J Malaysia; 2009 Mar; 64(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19852314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrograde ureteroscopy for distal ureteric stone removal in children.
    De Dominicis M; Matarazzo E; Capozza N; Collura G; Caione P
    BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1049-52. PubMed ID: 15839930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Distal ureteral lithiasis. ESWL versus ambulatory URS].
    Miján Ortiz JL; Gutiérrez Tejero F; López Carmona F; Nogueras Ocaña M; Arrabal Martín M; Zuluaga Gómez A
    Arch Esp Urol; 2001 Nov; 54(9):983-7. PubMed ID: 11789375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matched pair analysis of ureteroscopy vs. shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteric calculi.
    Stewart GD; Bariol SV; Moussa SA; Smith G; Tolley DA
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 May; 61(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 17386062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Symptomatic small non-obstructing lower ureteric calculi: comparison of ureteroscopy and extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Andankar MG; Maheshwari PN; Saple AL; Mehta V; Varshney A; Bansal B
    J Postgrad Med; 2001; 47(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11832618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones--a multivariate analysis study.
    Abdel-Khalek M; Sheir K; Elsobky E; Showkey S; Kenawy M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 14594691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Treatment of ureteral calculi: report of 152 calculi].
    Lamotte F; Izadifar V; Fontaine E; Barthélémy Y; Beurton D
    Prog Urol; 2000 Feb; 10(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 10785914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteric lithiasis. Analysis of 354 urs procedures in a community hospital.
    du Fossé W; Billiet I; Mattelaer J
    Acta Urol Belg; 1998 Oct; 66(3):33-40. PubMed ID: 9864877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
    El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
    BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.
    Bierkens AF; Hendrikx AJ; De La Rosette JJ; Stultiens GN; Beerlage HP; Arends AJ; Debruyne FM
    Br J Urol; 1998 Jan; 81(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 9467473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].
    Halachmi S; Goldin O; Gleizarov E; Kaufman Z; Ginesin Y; Meretyk S
    Harefuah; 2005 Sep; 144(9):605-8, 680, 679. PubMed ID: 16218527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Extracorporeal lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the treatment of calculi of the lower ureter].
    Netto Júnior NR; Claro JF
    Prog Urol; 1993 Feb; 3(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 8485594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.
    De Sio M; Autorino R; Quarto G; Mordente S; Giugliano F; Di Giacomo F; Neri F; Quattrone C; Sorrentino D; De Domenico R; D'Armiento M
    BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 17550410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones?
    Muslumanoglu AY; Karadag MA; Tefekli AH; Altunrende F; Tok A; Berberoglu Y
    Int J Urol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1385-8. PubMed ID: 17083388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
    Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.
    Strohmaier WL; Schubert G; Rosenkranz T; Weigl A
    Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 10516445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
    Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy as first-line therapy for patients with single, distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study.
    Verze P; Imbimbo C; Cancelmo G; Creta M; Palmieri A; Mangiapia F; Buonopane R; Mirone V
    BJU Int; 2010 Dec; 106(11):1748-52. PubMed ID: 20346030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.