385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16609005)
1. Phase II clinical trial design: methods in translational research from the Genitourinary Committee at the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
Gray R; Manola J; Saxman S; Wright J; Dutcher J; Atkins M; Carducci M; See W; Sweeney C; Liu G; Stein M; Dreicer R; Wilding G; DiPaola RS
Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 12(7 Pt 1):1966-9. PubMed ID: 16609005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel designs and end points for phase II clinical trials.
Adjei AA; Christian M; Ivy P
Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1866-72. PubMed ID: 19276272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trial design for evaluation of novel targeted therapies.
Farley J; Rose PG
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Feb; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19853899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phase II clinical trials in oncology: are we hitting the target?
Ang MK; Tan SB; Lim WT
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2010 Mar; 10(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 20214523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lessons learned from independent central review.
Ford R; Schwartz L; Dancey J; Dodd LE; Eisenhauer EA; Gwyther S; Rubinstein L; Sargent D; Shankar L; Therasse P; Verweij J
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):268-74. PubMed ID: 19101138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: the importance of randomisation.
Ratain MJ; Sargent DJ
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 19059773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.
El-Maraghi RH; Eisenhauer EA
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18285606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative evaluation of single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
Pond GR; Abbasi S
Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 21511687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examining heterogeneity in phase II trial designs may improve success in phase III.
Tuma RS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Feb; 100(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 18230788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized phase II designs in cancer clinical trials: current status and future directions.
Lee JJ; Feng L
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jul; 23(19):4450-7. PubMed ID: 15994154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression.
Stone A; Wheeler C; Carroll K; Barge A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 16807129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control.
Jung SH
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal designs for two-arm, phase II clinical trial design with multiple constraints.
Mayo MS; Mahnken JD; Soong SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):106-24. PubMed ID: 20077252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
Chen K; Shan M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Methodological approaches of clinical studies with targeted therapies].
Penel N; Saleron J; Lansiaux A; Clisant S; Adenis A; Fournier C; Duhamel A; Bonneterre J
Bull Cancer; 2008 Feb; 95(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 18304903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design.
Taylor JM; Braun TM; Li Z
Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):335-48. PubMed ID: 17060208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing the ongoing search for new treatments for Parkinson disease: using futility designs.
Tilley BC; Palesch YY; Kieburtz K; Ravina B; Huang P; Elm JJ; Shannon K; Wooten GF; Tanner CM; Goetz GC;
Neurology; 2006 Mar; 66(5):628-33. PubMed ID: 16534099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design and conduct of phase II studies of targeted anticancer therapy: recommendations from the task force on methodology for the development of innovative cancer therapies (MDICT).
Booth CM; Calvert AH; Giaccone G; Lobbezoo MW; Eisenhauer EA; Seymour LK
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jan; 44(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 17845846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Other paradigms: better treatments are identified by better trials: the value of randomized phase II studies.
Sharma MR; Maitland ML; Ratain MJ
Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 19826363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
