These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16609005)

  • 21. Other paradigms: randomized discontinuation trial design.
    Stadler W
    Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):431-4. PubMed ID: 19826364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Newer phase II trial designs gaining ground.
    Benowitz S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1428-9. PubMed ID: 17895467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Testing the wrong hypothesis in phase II oncology trials: there is a better alternative.
    Ratain MJ; Karrison TG
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Feb; 13(3):781-2. PubMed ID: 17289865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Randomised phase II trials in oncology].
    Piedbois P
    Bull Cancer; 2007 Nov; 94(11):953-6. PubMed ID: 18055312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patient selection for phase II trials.
    Sonpavde G; Galsky MD; Hutson TE; Von Hoff DD
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 32(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 19346816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Early selection in a randomized phase II clinical trial.
    Steinberg SM; Venzon DJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1711-26. PubMed ID: 12111907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.
    Jenkins M; Stone A; Jennison C
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 22328327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selecting promising ALS therapies in clinical trials.
    Cheung YK; Gordon PH; Levin B
    Neurology; 2006 Nov; 67(10):1748-51. PubMed ID: 17130405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can we eliminate placebo in ALS clinical Trials?
    Simmons Z
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Jun; 39(6):861-5. PubMed ID: 19382170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Designs for efficient clinical trials.
    Simon R
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1989 Jul; 3(7):43-9; discussion 51-3. PubMed ID: 2701811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of randomized discontinuation design.
    Freidlin B; Simon R
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Aug; 23(22):5094-8. PubMed ID: 15983399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials.
    Bretz F; Koenig F; Brannath W; Glimm E; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(8):1181-217. PubMed ID: 19206095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The cancer and leukemia group B pharmacology and experimental therapeutics committee: a historical perspective.
    Ratain MJ; Miller AA; McLeod HL; Venook AP; Egorin MJ; Schilsky RL
    Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Jun; 12(11 Pt 2):3612s-6s. PubMed ID: 16740794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An efficient algorithm to determine the optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs in oncology clinical trials.
    Zhang Y; Mietlowski W; Chen B; Wang Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 21191854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. From translational research to a large randomized clinical trial: a long and streanuous way from bench to bedside.
    Sakamoto J; Morita S
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):9-16. PubMed ID: 17378175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Lee T; Kim K; George SL
    Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 14755389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New designs for phase II trials: application to a trial of targeted therapies vs. chemotherapy in patients age > 60 with AML/high-risk MDS.
    Estey EH
    Ann Hematol; 2004; 83 Suppl 1():S94-6. PubMed ID: 15124692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of adaptive designs for phase II cancer trials.
    López MF; Dupuy JF; Gonzalez CV
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jan; 33(1):223-7. PubMed ID: 22001360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adaptive designs at European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) with a focus on adaptive sample size re-estimation based on interim-effect size.
    Mauer M; Collette L; Bogaerts J;
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Jun; 48(9):1386-91. PubMed ID: 22281098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Making the investigational oncology pipeline more efficient and effective: are we headed in the right direction?
    LoRusso PM; Anderson AB; Boerner SA; Averbuch SD
    Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Dec; 16(24):5956-62. PubMed ID: 21169248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.