These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16609130)
1. Independent component analysis of the EEG: is this the way forward for understanding abnormalities of brain-gut signalling? Hobson AR; Hillebrand A Gut; 2006 May; 55(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 16609130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New technologies to investigate the brain-gut axis. Sharma A; Lelic D; Brock C; Paine P; Aziz Q World J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jan; 15(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 19132768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cerebral processing of painful oesophageal stimulation: a study based on independent component analysis of the EEG. Drewes AM; Sami SA; Dimcevski G; Nielsen KD; Funch-Jensen P; Valeriani M; Arendt-Nielsen L Gut; 2006 May; 55(5):619-29. PubMed ID: 16210400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brain-gut axis in health and disease. Aziz Q; Thompson DG Gastroenterology; 1998 Mar; 114(3):559-78. PubMed ID: 9496948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings. Vigário R; Särelä J; Jousmäki V; Hämäläinen M; Oja E IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 May; 47(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 10851802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combining magnetoencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Mathiak K; Fallgatter AJ Int Rev Neurobiol; 2005; 68():121-48. PubMed ID: 16443012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses. Babajani A; Soltanian-Zadeh H IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1794-801. PubMed ID: 16941835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptive neural network classifier for decoding MEG signals. Zubarev I; Zetter R; Halme HL; Parkkonen L Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():425-434. PubMed ID: 31059799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. From the analysis of the brain images to the study of brain networks using functional connectivity and multimodal brain signals. Babiloni F Brain Topogr; 2010 Jun; 23(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 20454842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The algorithms and development for the extraction of evoked potentials]. Niu J; Qiu T Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 21(3):486-9. PubMed ID: 15250163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiplicative correction of subject effect as preprocessing for analysis of variance. Nemoto I; Abe M; Kotani M IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):941-8. PubMed ID: 18334385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detrended Fluctuation Analysis of EEG in detecting cross-modal plasticity in brain for blind. Kalaivani M; Ravindran G Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3441-4. PubMed ID: 19964981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of mutual information on independent component analysis in EEG/MEG analysis: a simulation study. Neumann A; Grosse-Wentrup M; Buss M; Gramann K Int J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 118(11):1534-46. PubMed ID: 18853332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional neuroimaging of visceral sensation. Aziz Q; Schnitzler A; Enck P J Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Nov; 17(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 11151978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI. Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]