These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16610289)
1. [A cassette with a mechanism for removal of radiographic film]. Sakhno NV; Chervanev VA; Troianovskaia LP; Priakhina NA Med Tekh; 2006; (1):43. PubMed ID: 16610289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam. Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems. Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Film/cassette size: time for a change? Bohland RJ Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):287. PubMed ID: 8058904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Vacuum cassette for radiography and its possibilities]. Blinov NN; Gorelik FG Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1994; (3):46-8. PubMed ID: 7985370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [An experimental study of the film parameters for general roentgenography]. Gorelik FG Med Tekh; 2000; (5):32-6. PubMed ID: 11076363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The influence of the spectrum and the type of exposure on the contrast of double-sided coated x-ray film]. Blendl C; Bollen R; Freytag KH Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1457475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of film-screen color sensitivity and type of measurement device on kVp measurements. Lam RW; Price SC Radiol Technol; 1989; 60(4):319-21. PubMed ID: 2928498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Analysis of the advantages of digital X-ray apparatuses over film X-ray apparatuses]. Elinson MB Med Tekh; 2005; (5):37-9. PubMed ID: 16285246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extraoral x-ray film continues to evolve, improve. Rostron T Dent Assist; 2003; 72(5):22-5. PubMed ID: 14596151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films. Egyed M; Shearer DR Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographic artifacts. Kirberger RM; Roos CJ J S Afr Vet Assoc; 1995 Jun; 66(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 8544168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evolution of X-ray image receivers]. Mazurov AI Med Tekh; 2004; (5):34-7. PubMed ID: 15568511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Recommendations for the X-ray film usage in our country practice]. Gorelik FG Med Tekh; 2003; (5):39-42. PubMed ID: 14603851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiformat cameras for the production of hard copy from digital radiographic systems. Edmonds EW; Hynes DM; Baranoski D; Rowlands J Appl Radiol; 1982; 11(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 10254349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets]. Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [To applicability of foreign medical radiographic films during various chemophotographic treatments]. Rudiger U; Golovkova SI; Kavtorova VP; Miagkova MG; Shevchenko VN Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2000; (3):60-2. PubMed ID: 11008561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]