178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16610459)
1. [Patient satisfaction with removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible].
Zitzmann NU; Marinello CP
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2006; 116(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 16610459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An economic evaluation of implant treatment in edentulous patients-preliminary results.
Zitzmann NU; Sendi P; Marinello CP
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15754888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized prospective clinical trial on the effectiveness of three treatment modalities for patients with lower denture problems. A 10 year follow-up study on patient satisfaction.
Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; van 't Hof M; Stegenga B; Vissink A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 14759108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the efficacy of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses in a group of Turkish patients: a quality of life study.
Cakir O; Kazancioglu HO; Celik G; Deger S; Ak G
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 24417762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts.
Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Success rates of microimplants in edentulous patients with residual ridge resorption.
Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 18548923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Implant-retained overdentures compared with complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. Satisfaction and subjective chewing capabilities].
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; van 't Hof MA; Geertman ME
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2002 Dec; 109(12):475-80. PubMed ID: 12572098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment outcomes of fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part I: patients' assessments.
Zitzmann NU; Marinello CP
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 10756292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of mandibular ridge height on patients' perceptions with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures.
Kimoto K; Garrett NR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 16274151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures.
Bryant SR; Walton JN; MacEntee MI
J Dent Res; 2015 Jan; 94(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 25348544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of fixed implant-supported prostheses, removable implant-supported prostheses, and complete dentures: patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life.
Oh SH; Kim Y; Park JY; Jung YJ; Kim SK; Park SY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):e31-7. PubMed ID: 25346286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Within-Subject Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Between a Two-Implant Overdenture and a Three-Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis in the Mandible.
Beresford D; Klineberg I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1374-1382. PubMed ID: 30427970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prosthetic treatment time and satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with conventional or implant-stabilized complete mandibular dentures: a case-control study (part 2).
Hobkirk JA; Abdel-Latif HH; Howlett J; Welfare R; Moles DR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19260422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment concept of the edentulous mandible with prefabricated telescopic abutments and immediate functional loading.
Romanos GE; May S; May D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 21691607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical trial of implant prostheses: performance and preference.
Feine J; Harrison J; Hutchins M
J Gt Houst Dent Soc; 1997 Dec; 69(5):31-2. PubMed ID: 9571871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant placement under existing removable dental prostheses and its effect on masticatory performance.
Wolfart S; Wolf K; Brunzel S; Wolfart M; Caliebe A; Kern M
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2447-2455. PubMed ID: 26936028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
