These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16610511)
1. ['Gold standard,' not 'golden standard']. Kneepkens CM Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Mar; 150(11):644-5; author reply 645. PubMed ID: 16610511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ['Gold standard', not 'golden standard']. Claassen JA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Dec; 149(52):2937. PubMed ID: 16402524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 5 Evaluation of a diagnostic test. Goodacre S Emerg Med J; 2009 Jan; 26(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 19104103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random. Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH Stat Med; 2011 Jan; 30(2):200. PubMed ID: 21204125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Regarding the paper 'Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random'. Skaik YA Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2568. PubMed ID: 20954220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The quality of measurement methods and its statistical estimation]. Läärä E; Aro S Duodecim; 1988; 104(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 3409823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Knowing how to read a scientific article. 4. Knowing how to apply a diagnostic test]. Coggiola M; Bobbio M; Bongioanni S; Demichelis B; Longo M G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Sep; 25(9):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8529859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]