147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16610685)
1. Endocervical and metaplastic cells: comparison of endocervical and metaplastic cell number in Papanicolaou smears with and without squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Izadi Mood N; Mozaffari Miandoab H
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 16610685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytology and curetting diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Bruehl FK; Dyhdalo KS; Hou Y; Clapacs E; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):556-562. PubMed ID: 32624383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of AgNOR technique and CEA expression in atypical metaplastic cells from cervical smears.
Rocher AE; Gonzalez A; Palaoro LA; Blanco AM
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2006 Jun; 28(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 16786722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The significance of endocervical cells and metaplastic squamous cells in liquid-based cervical cytology.
Leung KM; Lam M; Lee JW; Yeoh GP; Chan KW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Apr; 37(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 19217028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytologic characteristics of abnormal cells in prior "normal" cervical/vaginal Papanicolaou smears from women with a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Montes MA; Cibas ES; DiNisco SA; Lee KR
Cancer; 1999 Apr; 87(2):56-9. PubMed ID: 10227594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cytohistologic study of atypical glandular cells detected in cervical smears during cervical screening tests in Iran.
Mood NI; Eftekhar Z; Haratian A; Saeedi L; Rahimi-Moghaddam P; Yarandi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(1):257-61. PubMed ID: 16445641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a cervical cytology device (cell-sweep) based on comparison to colposcopic findings.
Kieswetter C; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller PB
J Natl Med Assoc; 2001 Nov; 93(11):436-9. PubMed ID: 11730116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The detection of endocervical gland involvement by high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in smears prepared from endocervical brush specimens.
Van Hoeven KH; Hanau CA; Hudock JA
Cytopathology; 1996 Oct; 7(5):310-5. PubMed ID: 8911754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can keratin 8 and 17 immunohistochemistry be of diagnostic value in cervical cytology? A feasibility study.
Martens J; Baars J; Smedts F; Holterheus M; Kok MJ; Vooijs P; Ramaekers F
Cancer; 1999 Apr; 87(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 10227599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical cancer screening with liquid cytology in women with developmental disabilities.
Kavoussi SK; Smith YR; Ernst SD; Quint EH
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009; 18(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 19072727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endocervical glandular involvement is associated with an increased detection rate of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on the Papanicolaou test.
Jones R; Dale F; Fite JJ; Cowan ML; Williamson B; DeLuca J; VandenBussche CJ
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(3):137-145. PubMed ID: 32147423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytologic features of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions involving endocervical glands on thin-layer cytology.
Selvaggi SM
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):689-90. PubMed ID: 16450913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Loss to follow-up of cervical smears without endocervical columnar cells is not disturbing.
Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Mulder J; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; de Bakker DH; Grol RP
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 16550967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics of false-negative ThinPrep cervical smears in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Leung KM; Lam KK; Tse PY; Yeoh GP; Chan KW
Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Aug; 14(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 18685162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.
Eisenberger D; Hernandez E; Tener T; Atkinson BF
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):755-8. PubMed ID: 9351759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
