293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16610785)
1. Catalytic site prediction and virtual screening of cytochrome P450 2D6 substrates by consideration of water and rescoring in automated docking.
de Graaf C; Oostenbrink C; Keizers PH; van der Wijst T; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP
J Med Chem; 2006 Apr; 49(8):2417-30. PubMed ID: 16610785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Binding mode prediction of cytochrome p450 and thymidine kinase protein-ligand complexes by consideration of water and rescoring in automated docking.
de Graaf C; Pospisil P; Pos W; Folkers G; Vermeulen NP
J Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 48(7):2308-18. PubMed ID: 15801824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.
Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW; Taylor RD
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):609-23. PubMed ID: 12910460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of multiple binding modes of the CDK2 inhibitors, anilinopyrazoles, using the automated docking programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: an evaluation of performance.
Sato H; Shewchuk LM; Tang J
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2552-62. PubMed ID: 17125195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benchmarking docking and scoring protocol for the identification of potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.
Zaheer-ul-Haq ; Halim SA; Uddin R; Madura JD
J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Jun; 28(8):870-82. PubMed ID: 20447848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of G-Protein Coupled Receptors suitable targets?
Bissantz C; Bernard P; Hibert M; Rognan D
Proteins; 2003 Jan; 50(1):5-25. PubMed ID: 12471595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synergistic use of compound properties and docking scores in neural network modeling of CYP2D6 binding: predicting affinity and conformational sampling.
Bazeley PS; Prithivi S; Struble CA; Povinelli RJ; Sem DS
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2698-708. PubMed ID: 17125210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of binding modes for ligands in the cytochromes P450 and other heme-containing proteins.
Kirton SB; Murray CW; Verdonk ML; Taylor RD
Proteins; 2005 Mar; 58(4):836-44. PubMed ID: 15651036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual screening and prediction of site of metabolism for cytochrome P450 1A2 ligands.
Vasanthanathan P; Hritz J; Taboureau O; Olsen L; Jørgensen FS; Vermeulen NP; Oostenbrink C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 19099399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy.
Kellenberger E; Rodrigo J; Muller P; Rognan D
Proteins; 2004 Nov; 57(2):225-42. PubMed ID: 15340911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective docking study of PDE4B ligands and an analysis of the behavior of selected scoring functions.
Mpamhanga CP; Chen B; McLay IM; Ormsby DL; Lindvall MK
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1061-74. PubMed ID: 16045302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring.
Radestock S; Weil T; Renner S
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1104-17. PubMed ID: 18442221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual screening for beta-secretase (BACE1) inhibitors reveals the importance of protonation states at Asp32 and Asp228.
Polgár T; Keserü GM
J Med Chem; 2005 Jun; 48(11):3749-55. PubMed ID: 15916426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure-based site of metabolism prediction for cytochrome P450 2D6.
Moors SL; Vos AM; Cummings MD; Van Vlijmen H; Ceulemans A
J Med Chem; 2011 Sep; 54(17):6098-105. PubMed ID: 21797232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
