293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16610785)
21. Validation of model of cytochrome P450 2D6: an in silico tool for predicting metabolism and inhibition.
Kemp CA; Flanagan JU; van Eldik AJ; Maréchal JD; Wolf CR; Roberts GC; Paine MJ; Sutcliffe MJ
J Med Chem; 2004 Oct; 47(22):5340-6. PubMed ID: 15481972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation studies of the site-directed docking program LibDock.
Rao SN; Head MS; Kulkarni A; LaLonde JM
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2159-71. PubMed ID: 17985863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy.
Erickson JA; Jalaie M; Robertson DH; Lewis RA; Vieth M
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 14695819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of incorporating the 2C5 crystal structure into comparative models of cytochrome P450 2D6.
Kirton SB; Kemp CA; Tomkinson NP; St-Gallay S; Sutcliffe MJ
Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(2):216-31. PubMed ID: 12211002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screening.
Vigers GP; Rizzi JP
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 14695822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Analysis of CYP2D6 substrate interactions by computational methods.
Ito Y; Kondo H; Goldfarb PS; Lewis DF
J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Feb; 26(6):947-56. PubMed ID: 17764997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Critical assessment of the automated AutoDock as a new docking tool for virtual screening.
Park H; Lee J; Lee S
Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 16988956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A statistical rescoring scheme for protein-ligand docking: Consideration of entropic effect.
Lee J; Seok C
Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):1074-83. PubMed ID: 18076034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Virtual screening to enrich a compound collection with CDK2 inhibitors using docking, scoring, and composite scoring models.
Cotesta S; Giordanetto F; Trosset JY; Crivori P; Kroemer RT; Stouten PF; Vulpetti A
Proteins; 2005 Sep; 60(4):629-43. PubMed ID: 16028223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Virtual screening against metalloenzymes for inhibitors and substrates.
Irwin JJ; Raushel FM; Shoichet BK
Biochemistry; 2005 Sep; 44(37):12316-28. PubMed ID: 16156645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of consensus scoring strategies for evaluating computational models of protein-ligand complexes.
Oda A; Tsuchida K; Takakura T; Yamaotsu N; Hirono S
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):380-91. PubMed ID: 16426072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.
Wang R; Lu Y; Fang X; Wang S
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2114-25. PubMed ID: 15554682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening.
Kontoyianni M; Sokol GS; McClellan LM
J Comput Chem; 2005 Jan; 26(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 15526325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accounting for ligand-bound metal ions in docking small molecules on adenylyl cyclase toxins.
Chen D; Menche G; Power TD; Sower L; Peterson JW; Schein CH
Proteins; 2007 May; 67(3):593-605. PubMed ID: 17311351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. HierVLS hierarchical docking protocol for virtual ligand screening of large-molecule databases.
Floriano WB; Vaidehi N; Zamanakos G; Goddard WA
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 14695820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Binding estimation after refinement, a new automated procedure for the refinement and rescoring of docked ligands in virtual screening.
Rastelli G; Degliesposti G; Del Rio A; Sgobba M
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Mar; 73(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 19207463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.
Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 18318474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
Huang SY; Zou X
Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
