These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16611355)

  • 1. Planning a cluster randomized trial with unequal cluster sizes: practical issues involving continuous outcomes.
    Guittet L; Ravaud P; Giraudeau B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Apr; 6():17. PubMed ID: 16611355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
    Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A priori postulated and real power in cluster randomized trials: mind the gap.
    Guittet L; Giraudeau B; Ravaud P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Aug; 5():25. PubMed ID: 16109162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations.
    Kerry SM; Bland JM
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 11180308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
    Moerbeek M; van Schie S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative efficiency and sample size for cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.
    You Z; Williams OD; Aban I; Kabagambe EK; Tiwari HK; Cutter G
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 21163852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.
    Blaha O; Esserman D; Li F
    Stat Med; 2022 Oct; 41(24):4860-4885. PubMed ID: 35908796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of baseline covariate imbalance on bias in treatment effect estimation in cluster randomized trials: Race as an example.
    Yang S; Starks MA; Hernandez AF; Turner EL; Califf RM; O'Connor CM; Mentz RJ; Roy Choudhury K
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Jan; 88():105775. PubMed ID: 31228563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cluster size variability and imbalance in cluster randomized controlled trials.
    Carter B
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2984-93. PubMed ID: 20963749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting and methodological quality of sample size calculations in cluster randomized trials could be improved: a review.
    Rutterford C; Taljaard M; Dixon S; Copas A; Eldridge S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 25523375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cluster randomized crossover trial: The effects of attrition in the AB/BA design and how to account for it in sample size calculations.
    Moerbeek M
    Clin Trials; 2020 Aug; 17(4):420-429. PubMed ID: 32191129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Explaining the variation in the attained power of a stepped-wedge trial with unequal cluster sizes.
    Ouyang Y; Karim ME; Gustafson P; Field TS; Wong H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):166. PubMed ID: 32580698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method.
    Eldridge SM; Ashby D; Kerry S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 35(5):1292-300. PubMed ID: 16943232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size calculations for cluster randomised controlled trials with a fixed number of clusters.
    Hemming K; Girling AJ; Sitch AJ; Marsh J; Lilford RJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jun; 11():102. PubMed ID: 21718530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intracluster correlation adjustments to maintain power in cluster trials for binary outcomes.
    Chakraborty H; Moore J; Hartwell TD
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 19386285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.
    Girling AJ
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(30):4652-4664. PubMed ID: 30209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.