These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16612894)

  • 1. Quantifying the gender load: can population crosses reveal interlocus sexual conflict?
    Long TA; Montgomerie R; Chippindale AK
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 361(1466):363-74. PubMed ID: 16612894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexually antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes of
    Lund-Hansen KK; Olito C; Morrow EH; Abbott JK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33602805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation.
    Friberg U; Lew TA; Byrne PG; Rice WR
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1540-51. PubMed ID: 16153039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing sexual conflict in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Rice WR; Stewart AD; Morrow EH; Linder JE; Orteiza N; Byrne PG
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 361(1466):287-99. PubMed ID: 16612888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing putative interlocus sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster using experimental evolution.
    Stewart AD; Morrow EH; Rice WR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Oct; 272(1576):2029-35. PubMed ID: 16191613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproductive consequences of population divergence through sexual conflict.
    Martin OY; Hosken DJ
    Curr Biol; 2004 May; 14(10):906-10. PubMed ID: 15186748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.
    Kwan L; Bedhomme S; Prasad NG; Chippindale AK
    J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 19147928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict.
    Lessells CM
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 361(1466):301-17. PubMed ID: 16612889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-genomic sexual conflict drives antagonistic coevolution in harvester ants.
    Herrmann M; Cahan SH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1797):. PubMed ID: 25355474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.
    Hopkins BR; Perry JC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Aug; 97(4):1426-1448. PubMed ID: 35249265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load.
    Holland B; Rice WR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1999 Apr; 96(9):5083-8. PubMed ID: 10220422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ecology of sexual conflict: ecologically dependent parallel evolution of male harm and female resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D; Dutton EM; Agrawal AF; Rundle HD
    Ecol Lett; 2014 Feb; 17(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 24215269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproductive Isolation through Experimental Manipulation of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Syed ZA; Chatterjee M; Samant MA; Prasad NG
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3330. PubMed ID: 28611437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution.
    Rowe L; Day T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 361(1466):277-85. PubMed ID: 16612887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual conflict drives male manipulation of female postmating responses in
    Hollis B; Koppik M; Wensing KU; Ruhmann H; Genzoni E; Erkosar B; Kawecki TJ; Fricke C; Keller L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(17):8437-8444. PubMed ID: 30962372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating the interaction between inter-locus and intra-locus sexual conflict using hemiclonal analysis in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Geeta Arun M; Chechi TS; Meena R; Bhosle SD; Srishti ; Prasad NG
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2022 Mar; 22(1):38. PubMed ID: 35346023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection.
    Pitnick S; Brown WD; Miller GT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1467):557-63. PubMed ID: 11297171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila.
    Knowles LL; Markow TA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(15):8692-6. PubMed ID: 11447265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of reduced post-copulatory molecular interactions in Drosophila populations lacking sperm competition.
    Hollis B; Houle D; Kawecki TJ
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jan; 29(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 26395588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.