These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16613021)

  • 1. Development of a computed tomographic calibration method for the determination of lean meat content in pig carcasses.
    Romvári R; Dobrowolski A; Repa I; Allen P; Olsen E; Szabó A; Horn P
    Acta Vet Hung; 2006 Mar; 54(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16613021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration.
    Berg EP; Forrest JC; Fisher JE
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2642-52. PubMed ID: 7883623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of belly composition variability in pigs by in vivo computed tomographic scanning.
    Romvári R; Szabó A; Kárpáti J; Kovách G; Bázár G; Horn P
    Acta Vet Hung; 2005; 53(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 15959974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lean content prediction in pig carcasses, loin and ham by computed tomography (CT) using a density model.
    Picouet PA; Teran F; Gispert M; Font i Furnols M
    Meat Sci; 2010 Nov; 86(3):616-22. PubMed ID: 20656413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Collewet G; Bogner P; Allen P; Busk H; Dobrowolski A; Olsen E; Davenel A
    Meat Sci; 2005 Aug; 70(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 22063881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic parameters between slaughter pig efficiency and growth rate of different body tissues estimated by computed tomography in live boars of Landrace and Duroc.
    Gjerlaug-Enger E; Kongsro J; Odegård J; Aass L; Vangen O
    Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22436149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting beef cuts composition, fatty acids and meat quality characteristics by spiral computed tomography.
    Prieto N; Navajas EA; Richardson RI; Ross DW; Hyslop JJ; Simm G; Roehe R
    Meat Sci; 2010 Nov; 86(3):770-9. PubMed ID: 20655149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multivariate regression analysis applied to the calibration of equipment used in pig meat classification in Romania.
    Savescu RF; Laba M
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jun; 116():16-25. PubMed ID: 26835835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing beef carcass tissue weights using computed tomography spirals of primal cuts.
    Navajas EA; Glasbey CA; Fisher AV; Ross DW; Hyslop JJ; Richardson RI; Simm G; Roehe R
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jan; 84(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 20374751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different methods to assess the composition of pig bellies in progeny testing.
    Tholen E; Baulain U; Henning MD; Schellander K
    J Anim Sci; 2003 May; 81(5):1177-84. PubMed ID: 12772844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of carcass composition by ultrasound measurements in 4 anatomical locations of 3 commercial categories of lamb.
    Ripoll G; Joy M; Sanz A
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3409-18. PubMed ID: 20562368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo estimation of goat carcass composition and body fat partition by real-time ultrasonography.
    Teixeira A; Joy M; Delfa R
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2369-76. PubMed ID: 18469057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virtual dissection of pig carcasses.
    Vester-Christensen M; Erbou SG; Hansen MF; Olsen EV; Christensen LB; Hviid M; Ersbøll BK; Larsen R
    Meat Sci; 2009 Apr; 81(4):699-704. PubMed ID: 20416568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of computed tomography and manual dissection for calibration of devices for pig carcass classification - Evaluation of uncertainty.
    Olsen EV; Christensen LB; Nielsen DB
    Meat Sci; 2017 Jan; 123():35-44. PubMed ID: 27614178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of increasing lysine on carcass composition and cutting yields of immunologically castrated male pigs.
    Boler DD; Kutzler LW; Meeuwse DM; King VL; Campion DR; McKeith FK; Killefer J
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2189-99. PubMed ID: 21383034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel ultrasound approach for measuring marbling in pork.
    Ludwiczak A; Stanisz M; Lisiak D; Janiszewski P; Bykowska M; Składanowska J; Ślósarz P
    Meat Sci; 2017 Sep; 131():176-182. PubMed ID: 28528296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
    Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carcass composition and meat quality of indigenous Yanan pigs of China.
    Jiang YZ; Zhu L; Li FQ; Li XW
    Genet Mol Res; 2012 Jan; 11(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 22370883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Video image analysis as a potential grading system for Uruguayan beef carcasses.
    Vote DJ; Bowling MB; Cunha BC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Montossi F; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2376-90. PubMed ID: 19395512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lean meat prediction with HGP, CGM and CSB-Image-Meater, with prediction accuracy evaluated for different proportions of gilts, boars and castrated boars in the pig population.
    Engel B; Lambooij E; Buist WG; Vereijken P
    Meat Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 21871739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.