112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16613144)
1. [Aortic root enlargement in elderly patients].
Sekino Y; Yamaya K; Ito T; Sakuma K; Sato S; Tabayashi K
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 16613144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Apicoaortic conduit insertion for elderly patients with acquired aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus].
Takemura T; Tsuda Y
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 16613147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with small aortic annulus; is the indexed effective orifice area important?].
Baba H; Aoki M; Nishimura Y; Hashimoto M; Okawa Y
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):329-35. PubMed ID: 16613153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An alternative option for elderly patients with a small aortic annulus: the 16 mm ATS valve.
Nakamura Y; Nakano K; Tagusari O; Kataoka G; Seike Y; Domoto S; Ito Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Nov; 18(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 20099719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical outcome of aortic valve replacement with 19-mm prosthetic valve in elderly patients].
Fujita S; Shimamoto M; Yamazaki F; Nakai M; Takeuchi K; Masumoto H; Iwakura T; Itonaga T; Motoyama H
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 16613150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Surgical technique of aortic valve replacement for small aortic annulus in elderly patients].
Hata T; Fujiwara K; Furukawa H; Tsushima Y; Yoshitaka H; Kuinose M; Minami H; Ishida A; Tamura K; Totsugawa T; Kanemitsu H; Ozawa M
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 16613145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Advantage of supra-annular patch enlargement in aortic stenosis with a small aortic annulus].
Hamasaki A; Yaginuma G
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 16613146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Aortic valve replacement for the small aortic annulus].
Oshima H; Usui A; Akita T; Ueda Y
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 16613143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical outcome of stentless aortic valve replacement for calcified aortic stenosis.
Inamura S; Furuya H; Yagi K; Ikeya E; Yamaguchi M; Fujimura T; Kanabuchi K
Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2006 Sep; 31(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 21302237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Avoidance of patient-prosthesis mismatch].
Sakamoto Y; Hashimoto K
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 16613142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Intermediate results of aortic valve replacement using 19 mm bioprosthetic valve].
Funatsu T; Takeuchi M; Masai T; Fukuda H
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Sep; 59(10):904-8. PubMed ID: 16986685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival and left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
Kato Y; Suehiro S; Shibata T; Sasaki Y; Hirai H
J Card Surg; 2007; 22(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 17661773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of aortic valve replacement involving small severely calcified aortic annulus in elderly patients].
Iwahashi M; Nishimura Y; Hiramatsu K; Komori S; Shibata M; Yuzaki M; Okamura Y
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):336-9. PubMed ID: 16613154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the effects of aortic valve replacement using 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis and 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis.
Tanigawa K; Eishi K; Yamachika S; Hashizume K; Tada S; Yamane K; Izumi K; Takai H; Miura T; Nakaji S
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 14(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 18414344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis.
García-Bengochea J; Sierra J; González-Juanatey JR; Rubio J; Vega M; Fernández AL; Sánchez D
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):446-51; discussion 451-2. PubMed ID: 16784087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early hemodynamic results of the Shelhigh SuperStentless aortic bioprostheses.
Cattaneo P; Bruno VD; Mariscalco G; Marchetti P; Ferrarese S; Salerno-Uriarte J; Sala A
J Card Surg; 2007; 22(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 17803572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Impacts of aortic valve replacement on cardiac function in patients with aortic stenosis].
Hamasaki A; Yaginuma G; Watanabe S; Kawarai S; Kawahara Y; Ogoshi N; Ito Y
Kyobu Geka; 2007 Feb; 60(2):89-93; discussion 93-6. PubMed ID: 17305072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stentless valves versus stented bioprostheses at the aortic position: midterm results.
Narang S; Satsangi DK; Banerjee A; Geelani MA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Oct; 136(4):943-7. PubMed ID: 18954634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical aspects of endovascular retrograde implantation of the aortic CoreValve bioprosthesis in high-risk older patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.
Marcheix B; Lamarche Y; Berry C; Asgar A; Laborde JC; Basmadjian A; Ducharme A; Denault A; Bonan R; Cartier R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Nov; 134(5):1150-6. PubMed ID: 17976442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
