123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16613306)
1. Effect of computer-aided detection on mammographic performance: experimental study on readers with different levels of experience.
Hukkinen K; Vehmas T; Pamilo M; Kivisaari L
Acta Radiol; 2006 Apr; 47(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 16613306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.
Cawson JN; Nickson C; Amos A; Hill G; Whan AB; Kavanagh AM
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 19788479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the impact of CAD on the sensitivity and specificity of film readers.
Taylor P; Given-Wilson R; Champness J; Potts HW; Johnston K
Clin Radiol; 2004 Dec; 59(12):1099-105. PubMed ID: 15556592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma].
Funovics M; Schamp S; Helbich TH; Lackner B; Wunderbaldinger P; Fuchsjäger M; Lechner G; Wolf G
Rofo; 2001 Mar; 173(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 11293863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standalone computer-aided detection compared to radiologists' performance for the detection of mammographic masses.
Hupse R; Samulski M; Lobbes M; den Heeten A; Imhof-Tas MW; Beijerinck D; Pijnappel R; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 22772149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of the number of readers on mammography interpretation.
Hukkinen K; Kivisaari L; Vehmas T
Acta Radiol; 2006 Sep; 47(7):655-9. PubMed ID: 16950700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity and specificity of computer-assisted breast cancer detection in mammography screening.
Thurfjell E; Thurfjell MG; Egge E; Bjurstam N
Acta Radiol; 1998 Jul; 39(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 9685824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decrease in interpretation time for both novice and experienced readers using a concurrent computer-aided detection system for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chae EY; Kim HH; Jeong JW; Chae SH; Lee S; Choi YW
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2518-2525. PubMed ID: 30547203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
Fenton JJ; Taplin SH; Carney PA; Abraham L; Sickles EA; D'Orsi C; Berns EA; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1399-409. PubMed ID: 17409321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Levy L; Toubiana PR; Cohen-Scali F; Toledano AY; Boyer B
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():83-89. PubMed ID: 29153373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.
Houssami N; Given-Wilson R; Ciatto S
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 19527363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.
Georgian-Smith D; Moore RH; Halpern E; Yeh ED; Rafferty EA; D'Alessandro HA; Staffa M; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 17954651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review.
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Burke P; Visioli C; Paci E; Zappa M
Br J Cancer; 2003 Nov; 89(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 14583763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
