These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16614137)

  • 1. Validation of a handheld display device for an expandable labeled magnitude scale (LMS).
    Guest S; Wells M; Dancer C; Essick G
    Chem Senses; 2006 Jul; 31(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 16614137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching.
    Bartoshuk LM; Duffy VB; Green BG; Hoffman HJ; Ko CW; Lucchina LA; Marks LE; Snyder DJ; Weiffenbach JM
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Aug; 82(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15234598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived intensity and pleasantness of sucrose taste in male alcoholics.
    Wronski M; Skrok-Wolska D; Samochowiec J; Ziolkowski M; Swiecicki L; Bienkowski P; Korkosz A; Zatorski P; Kukwa W; Scinska A
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2007; 42(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17267440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of an application for making palmtop computers accessible to individuals with intellectual disabilities.
    Stock SE; Davies DK; Davies KR; Wehmeyer ML
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2006 Mar; 31(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16766321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and testing of a labeled magnitude scale of perceived satiety.
    Cardello AV; Schutz HG; Lesher LL; Merrill E
    Appetite; 2005 Feb; 44(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15604029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is electrogustometry useful for screening abnormalities of taste?
    Ellegård EK; Hay KD; Morton RP
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Dec; 121(12):1161-4. PubMed ID: 17931447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Taste intensity and hedonic responses to simple beverages in gastrointestinal cancer patients.
    Bossola M; Cadoni G; Bellantone R; Carriero C; Carriero E; Ottaviani F; Borzomati D; Tortorelli A; Doglietto GB
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2007 Nov; 34(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 17616339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the umami taste intensity of green tea by a taste sensor.
    Hayashi N; Chen R; Ikezaki H; Ujihara T
    J Agric Food Chem; 2008 Aug; 56(16):7384-7. PubMed ID: 18620401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociating pleasantness and intensity with quinine sulfate/sucrose mixtures in taste.
    Veldhuizen MG; van Rooden AP; Kroeze JH
    Chem Senses; 2006 Sep; 31(7):649-53. PubMed ID: 16793856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Gustometry usefulness for the evaluation of taste sense efficiency. Part I. The range of taste substances concentrations and the result of gustometry examination].
    Klimacka-Nawrot E; Suchecka W; Błońska-Fajfrowska B
    Wiad Lek; 2007; 60(9-10):409-14. PubMed ID: 18350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation.
    Hayes JE; Duffy VB
    Chem Senses; 2007 Mar; 32(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 17204520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.
    Li L; Liu X; Herr K
    Pain Med; 2007 Apr; 8(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 17371409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ARES test system for palm OS handheld computers.
    Elsmore TF; Reeves DL; Reeves AN
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Feb; 22 Suppl 1():S135-44. PubMed ID: 17166694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oxytocin null mice ingest enhanced amounts of sweet solutions during light and dark cycles and during repeated shaker stress.
    Billings LB; Spero JA; Vollmer RR; Amico JA
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 171(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 16677726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychosocial correlates of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) ratings in a birth cohort.
    McAnally HM; Poulton R; Hancox RJ; Prescott J; Welch D
    Appetite; 2007 Nov; 49(3):700-3. PubMed ID: 17766007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The hungry caterpillar: an analysis of how carbohydrates stimulate feeding in Manduca sexta.
    Glendinning JI; Jerud A; Reinherz AT
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Sep; 210(Pt 17):3054-67. PubMed ID: 17704080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Studies on the relationship between electrogustometry and sour taste perception.
    Ellegård EK; Goldsmith D; Hay KD; Stillman JA; Morton RP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Dec; 34(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 17467215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Persistence of context effects after training and with intensity references.
    Olabi A; Lawless HT
    J Food Sci; 2008 May; 73(4):S185-9. PubMed ID: 18460142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast and range effects for category, magnitude and labeled magnitude scales in judgements of sweetness intensity.
    Lawless HT; Horne J; Spiers W
    Chem Senses; 2000 Feb; 25(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 10667998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.