These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16614578)

  • 1. Accuracy of the contrast sensitivity card test for infants: retest variability and prediction of spatial resolution.
    Drover JR; Courage ML; Dalton SM; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 16614578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast sensitivity in 24- and 36-month-olds as assessed with the contrast sensitivity card procedure.
    Adams RJ; Courage ML
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Feb; 70(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 8446383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of the CSV-1000 in adults and children.
    Kelly SA; Pang Y; Klemencic S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 89(8):1172-81. PubMed ID: 22797510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [500 visual acuity tests in infants with Teller acuity cards].
    Vital-Durand F; Hullo A
    Ophtalmologie; 1990; 4(2):208-11. PubMed ID: 2235017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
    Cho P; Woo GC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The SKILL Card. An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance.
    Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Brabyn J; Schneck ME; Jampolsky A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 38(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 9008645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monocular acuity norms for the Teller Acuity Cards between ages one month and four years.
    Mayer DL; Beiser AS; Warner AF; Pratt EM; Raye KN; Lang JM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Mar; 36(3):671-85. PubMed ID: 7890497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the effectiveness of the infant contrast sensitivity card procedure.
    Drover JR; Earle AE; Courage ML; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 79(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11828899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Melbourne Edge Test contrast sensitivity measures in the visually impaired.
    Wolffsohn JS; Eperjesi F; Napper G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 15953123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests.
    Bühren J; Terzi E; Bach M; Wesemann W; Kohnen T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Teller II and Cardiff Acuity testing in a school-age deafblind population.
    Johnson C; Kran BS; Deng L; Mayer DL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 19214131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision.
    Leat SJ; Woo GC
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 6)():893-9. PubMed ID: 9537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP.
    Almoqbel F; Leat SJ; Irving E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 18761477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated measurement of resolution acuity in infants using remote eye-tracking.
    Jones PR; Kalwarowsky S; Atkinson J; Braddick OJ; Nardini M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 55(12):8102-10. PubMed ID: 25352118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.
    Arditi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2225-9. PubMed ID: 15914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Normative contrast sensitivity values for the back-lit Melbourne Edge Test and the effect of visual impairment.
    Eperjesi F; Wolffsohn J; Bowden J; Napper G; Rubinstein M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):600-6. PubMed ID: 15491489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A forced choice procedure for evaluation of contrast sensitivity function in preschool children.
    Richman JE; Lyons S
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Dec; 65(12):859-64. PubMed ID: 7852704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual acuity estimates in noncommunicative elderly persons.
    Marx MS; Werner P; Cohen-Mansfield J; Hartmann EE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 31(3):593-6. PubMed ID: 2318597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.