These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16614580)

  • 1. Comparison of subjective heterophoria testing with a phoropter and trial frame.
    Casillas Casillas E; Rosenfield M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 16614580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of heterophoria measurement technique on the clinical accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio.
    Escalante JB; Rosenfield M
    Optometry; 2006 May; 77(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 16651213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of near heterophoria tests under varying conditions on an adult sample.
    Lam AK; Lam A; Charm J; Wong KM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Mar; 25(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 15713208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of near-dissociated heterophoria tests in free space.
    Sanker N; Prabhu A; Ray A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Nov; 95(6):638-42. PubMed ID: 22882343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability and agreement in the measurement of horizontal fusional vergences.
    Antona B; Barrio A; Barra F; Gonzalez E; Sanchez I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 18761485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
    Karania R; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation.
    Rosenfield M; Cohen AS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 May; 16(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 8977892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixation disparity at different viewing distances and the preferred viewing distance in a laboratory near-vision task.
    Jaschinski W
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Jan; 18(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 9666908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of heterophoria and phoria adaptation using an automated objective system compared to clinical methods.
    Han SJ; Guo Y; Granger-Donetti B; Vicci VR; Alvarez TL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jan; 30(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 19682268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective measurements of amplitude of accommodation.
    León AÁ; Medrano SM; Rosenfield M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Mar; 32(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 22268597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of prolonged dissociation on the subjective measurement of near heterophoria.
    Rosenfield M; Chun TW; Fischer SE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Nov; 17(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 9666921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strabometry precision: intra-examiner repeatability and agreement in measuring the magnitude of the angle of latent binocular ocular deviations (heterophorias or latent strabismus).
    Antona B; Gonzalez E; Barrio A; Barra F; Sanchez I; Cebrian JL
    Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2011; 26(2):91-104. PubMed ID: 21736550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accommodative response during distance optometric test procedures.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ; Rosen J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Sep; 63(9):614-8. PubMed ID: 1430751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overaccommodation, underaccommodation, and the clinical phoropter: a study of instrument myopia and related effects.
    Miller RJ; Wesner MF; Pigion RG; Martin KD
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 May; 61(5):293-303. PubMed ID: 6731578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The repeatability and reproducibility of four techniques for measuring horizontal heterophoria: Implications for clinical practice.
    Anstice NS; Davidson B; Field B; Mathan J; Collins AV; Black JM
    J Optom; 2021; 14(3):275-281. PubMed ID: 32798131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability of the modified Thorington card used to measure far heterophoria.
    Cebrian JL; Antona B; Barrio A; Gonzalez E; Gutierrez A; Sanchez I
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Jul; 91(7):786-92. PubMed ID: 24901486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Normative data for modified Thorington phorias and prism bar vergences from the Benton-IU study.
    Lyon DW; Goss DA; Horner D; Downey JP; Rainey B
    Optometry; 2005 Oct; 76(10):593-9. PubMed ID: 16230275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra-examiner repeatability and agreement in accommodative response measurements.
    Antona B; Sanchez I; Barrio A; Barra F; Gonzalez E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 19663924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phoria variation secondary to cover test technique at near.
    Sparks BI
    Optometry; 2002 Jan; 73(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 12363239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strabismus and binocular functions in a sample of Swedish children aged 4-15 years.
    Aring E; Grönlund MA; Andersson S; Hård AL; Ygge J; Hellström A
    Strabismus; 2005 Jun; 13(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 16020358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.