These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16614669)

  • 21. Peer review.
    Felton G; Swanson EA
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 7844277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is peer review in crisis?
    Mulligan A
    Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 15695114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Lakartidningen's scrutiny routines--equal to the heavies. The peer review system and the expert editorial staff guarantee scientific quality].
    Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Bågedahl-Strindlund M; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Ostergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Nov; 100(48):3934-6. PubMed ID: 14717088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. UK Parliament comments on peer review.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2011 Oct; 13(10):1153. PubMed ID: 21968987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. It is time to learn the lessons from Stoke.
    Hall D
    BMJ; 2000 Nov; 321(7272):1346-7; author reply 1348-9. PubMed ID: 11090526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The
    Wang YF; Handelsman D; Cooper TG
    Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(5):511. PubMed ID: 28782736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice.
    Committee on Public Ethics.
    J Postgrad Med; 2000; 46(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 11298477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An international study of research misconduct policies.
    Resnik DB; Rasmussen LM; Kissling GE
    Account Res; 2015; 22(5):249-66. PubMed ID: 25928177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Introduction: Forum on Responsible Conduct in Biomedical Research.
    Cassidy MM
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):203-4. PubMed ID: 10964252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
    Biddle C
    AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Advice for reviewers (and authors and readers).
    Elston DM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Nov; 79(5):821. PubMed ID: 29128461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic-assisted versus standard unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-evaluation of manuscript conflict of interests, funding, scientific quality and bibliometrics.
    Cavinatto L; Bronson MJ; Chen DD; Moucha CS
    Int Orthop; 2019 Aug; 43(8):1865-1871. PubMed ID: 30291391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scientific Misconduct Hurts.
    Laine C
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Jan; 166(2):148-149. PubMed ID: 27951591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer Review in Scientific Scholarship.
    Lowe NK
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2017; 46(6):799-800. PubMed ID: 29028479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peer Review Week 2020: Trust in Peer Review.
    Picciotto MR
    J Neurosci; 2020 Sep; 40(39):7378. PubMed ID: 32968025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A proposed research misconduct policy for universities and postgraduate colleges in developing countries.
    Adesanya AA
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2020; 27(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 32687128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research integrity: time for global action.
    The Lancet
    Lancet; 2019 Nov; 394(10213):1965. PubMed ID: 31789204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud.
    Carrió I
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethics in research.
    Shamoo AE; Dunigan CD
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 10964253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ethics of reviewing scientific publications.
    Napolitani F; Petrini C; Garattini S
    Eur J Intern Med; 2017 May; 40():22-25. PubMed ID: 28038824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.