BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16615059)

  • 21. Analysis of human brain exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields: a numerical assessment of spatially averaged electric fields and exposure limits.
    Chen XL; Benkler S; Chavannes N; De Santis V; Bakker J; van Rhoon G; Mosig J; Kuster N
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2013 Jul; 34(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 23404214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Variability analysis of SAR from 20 MHz to 2.4 GHz for different adult and child models using finite-difference time-domain.
    Conil E; Hadjem A; Lacroux F; Wong MF; Wiart J
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1511-25. PubMed ID: 18367785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dosimetric evaluation and comparison of different RF exposure apparatuses used in human volunteer studies.
    Boutry CM; Kuehn S; Achermann P; Romann A; Keshvari J; Kuster N
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Jan; 29(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 17694536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 7 T body MRI: B1 shimming with simultaneous SAR reduction.
    van den Bergen B; Van den Berg CA; Bartels LW; Lagendijk JJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5429-41. PubMed ID: 17762096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of SAR calculation algorithms for the finite-difference time-domain method.
    Laakso I; Uusitupa T; Ilvonen S
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):N421-31. PubMed ID: 20647604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial averaging of fields from half-wave dipole antennas and corresponding SAR calculations in the NORMAN human voxel model between 65 MHz and 2 GHz.
    Findlay RP; Dimbylow PJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):2437-47. PubMed ID: 19336844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterization of the electromagnetic near-field absorption in layered biological tissue in the frequency range from 30 MHz to 6,000 MHz.
    Christ A; Samaras T; Klingenböck A; Kuster N
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4951-65. PubMed ID: 16985280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Postured voxel-based human models for electromagnetic dosimetry.
    Nagaoka T; Watanabe S
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7047-61. PubMed ID: 19015577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Global gene response to GSM 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field in MCF-7 cells].
    Wang LL; Chen GD; Lu DQ; Chiang H; Xu ZP
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 May; 40(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 16836876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characterization of personal RF electromagnetic field exposure and actual absorption for the general public.
    Joseph W; Vermeeren G; Verloock L; Heredia MM; Martens L
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 18695413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of a 902.4 MHz GSM signal on the human visual system: investigation of the discrimination threshold.
    Irlenbusch L; Bartsch B; Cooper J; Herget I; Marx B; Raczek J; Thoss F
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Dec; 28(8):648-54. PubMed ID: 17654531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of posture on FDTD calculations of specific absorption rate in a voxel model of the human body.
    Findlay RP; Dimbylow PJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3825-35. PubMed ID: 16077229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Desktop exposure system and dosimetry for small scale in vivo radiofrequency exposure experiments.
    Gong Y; Capstick M; Tillmann T; Dasenbrock C; Samaras T; Kuster N
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2016 Jan; 37(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 26769169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dosimetry evaluation of a cylindrical waveguide chamber for unrestrained small rodents at 1.9 GHz.
    Wasoontarajaroen S; Thansandote A; Gajda GB; Lemay EP; McNamee JP; Bellier PV
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 Oct; 33(7):575-84. PubMed ID: 22496052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Numerical and experimental dosimetry of Petri dish exposure setups.
    Burkhardt M; Poković K; Gnos M; Schmid T; Kuster N
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1996; 17(6):483-93. PubMed ID: 8986366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of the computational uncertainty of temperature rise and SAR in the eyes and brain under far-field exposure from 1 to 10 GHz.
    Laakso I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3393-404. PubMed ID: 19436102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exposure setup for animal experiments using a parabolic reflector.
    Schelkshorn S; Tejero S; Detlefsen J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17586585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigation of co-genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in vivo.
    Verschaeve L; Heikkinen P; Verheyen G; Van Gorp U; Boonen F; Vander Plaetse F; Maes A; Kumlin T; Mäki-Paakkanen J; Puranen L; Juutilainen J
    Radiat Res; 2006 May; 165(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16669742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Calculated SAR distributions in a human voxel phantom due to the reflection of electromagnetic fields from a ground plane between 65 MHz and 2 GHz.
    Findlay RP; Dimbylow PJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2277-89. PubMed ID: 18401062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.