These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16615213)

  • 1. Sexual reproduction reshapes the genetic architecture of digital organisms.
    Misevic D; Ofria C; Lenski RE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 273(1585):457-64. PubMed ID: 16615213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction.
    MacCarthy T; Bergman A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(31):12801-6. PubMed ID: 17646644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic architecture and the evolution of sex.
    Lohaus R; Burch CL; Azevedo RB
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S142-57. PubMed ID: 20421324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experiments with digital organisms on the origin and maintenance of sex in changing environments.
    Misevic D; Ofria C; Lenski RE
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S46-54. PubMed ID: 20200140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift.
    de Visser JA; Elena SF
    Nat Rev Genet; 2007 Feb; 8(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 17230200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stabilizing selection, mutational bias, and the evolution of sex.
    Vanhoenacker E; Sandell L; Roze D
    Evolution; 2018 Sep; 72(9):1740-1758. PubMed ID: 29993124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks.
    Azevedo RB; Lohaus R; Srinivasan S; Dang KK; Burch CL
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7080):87-90. PubMed ID: 16511495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution can favor antagonistic epistasis.
    Desai MM; Weissman D; Feldman MW
    Genetics; 2007 Oct; 177(2):1001-10. PubMed ID: 17720923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quasispecies approach to the evolution of sexual replication in unicellular organisms.
    Tannenbaum E; Fontanari JF
    Theory Biosci; 2008 Mar; 127(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18286313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epistasis, pleiotropy, and the mutation load in sexual and asexual populations.
    Roze D; Blanckaert A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 24372600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination.
    Charlesworth B
    Genet Res; 1990 Jun; 55(3):199-221. PubMed ID: 2394378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis.
    Gandon S; Otto SP
    Genetics; 2007 Apr; 175(4):1835-53. PubMed ID: 17277371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of epistatic gene interactions in the response to selection and the evolution of evolvability.
    Carter AJ; Hermisson J; Hansen TF
    Theor Popul Biol; 2005 Nov; 68(3):179-96. PubMed ID: 16122771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deleterious transposable elements and the extinction of asexuals.
    Arkhipova I; Meselson M
    Bioessays; 2005 Jan; 27(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15612027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Additive genetic variation and evolvability of a multivariate trait can be increased by epistatic gene action.
    Griswold CK
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Dec; 387():241-57. PubMed ID: 26431770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of three replication strategies in complex multicellular organisms: asexual replication, sexual replication with identical gametes, and sexual replication with distinct sperm and egg gametes.
    Tannenbaum E
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Jan; 77(1 Pt 1):011915. PubMed ID: 18351884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolutionary genetic consequences of facultative sex and outcrossing.
    Hartfield M
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jan; 29(1):5-22. PubMed ID: 26431643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome structure and the benefit of sex.
    Watson RA; Weinreich DM; Wakeley J
    Evolution; 2011 Feb; 65(2):523-36. PubMed ID: 21029076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The conservation of redundancy in genetic systems: effects of sexual and asexual reproduction.
    Morris JA; Morris RD
    J Biosci; 2003 Dec; 28(6):671-81. PubMed ID: 14660866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Synergy from reproductive division of labor and genetic complexity drive the evolution of sex.
    Jaffe K
    J Biol Phys; 2018 Sep; 44(3):317-329. PubMed ID: 29663185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.