These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16615324)

  • 21. Recalling episodic and semantic information about famous faces and voices.
    Damjanovic L; Hanley JR
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1205-10. PubMed ID: 18035621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accounts of blending, distinctiveness, and typicality in the false recognition of faces.
    Busey TA; Tunnicliff JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Sep; 25(5):1210-35. PubMed ID: 10505343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The P200 predominantly reflects distance-to-norm in face space whereas the N250 reflects activation of identity-specific representations of known faces.
    Wuttke SJ; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jan; 140():86-95. PubMed ID: 30529289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Facial typicality and attractiveness reflect an ideal dimension of face structure.
    Trujillo LT; Anderson EM
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101541. PubMed ID: 36587465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age.
    Bartlett JC; Fulton A
    Mem Cognit; 1991 May; 19(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 1861609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Understanding face recognition.
    Bruce V; Young A
    Br J Psychol; 1986 Aug; 77 ( Pt 3)():305-27. PubMed ID: 3756376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reinstatement of encoding context during recollection: behavioural and neuroimaging evidence of a double dissociation.
    Skinner EI; Manios M; Fugelsang J; Fernandes MA
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 May; 264():51-63. PubMed ID: 24495660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptual and Social Attributes Underlining Age-Related Preferences for Faces.
    Kiiski HS; Cullen B; Clavin SL; Newell FN
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():437. PubMed ID: 27630553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Face recognition and emotional valence: processing without awareness by neurologically intact participants does not simulate covert recognition in prosopagnosia.
    Stone A; Valentine T; Davis R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2001 Jun; 1(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 12467113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Expression influences the recognition of familiar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Perception; 2004; 33(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 15222388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. For Your Local Eyes Only: Culture-Specific Face Typicality Influences Perceptions of Trustworthiness.
    Sofer C; Dotsch R; Oikawa M; Oikawa H; Wigboldus DHJ; Todorov A
    Perception; 2017 Aug; 46(8):914-928. PubMed ID: 28152651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attractiveness and distinctiveness between speakers' voices in naturalistic speech and their faces are uncorrelated.
    Zäske R; Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Dec; 7(12):201244. PubMed ID: 33489273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preadolescents' recognition of faces of unfamiliar peers: the effect of attractiveness of faces.
    Mallet P; Lallemand N
    J Genet Psychol; 2003 Dec; 164(4):453-71. PubMed ID: 14719778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Smiling emphasizes perceived distinctiveness of faces.
    Kawamura S; Komori M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Aug; 107(1):119-20. PubMed ID: 18986039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of distinctiveness, repetition and semantic priming on the recognition of face familiarity.
    Bruce V; Dench N; Burton M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Mar; 47(1):38-60. PubMed ID: 8481711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using ecphoric confidence ratings to discriminate seen from unseen faces: the effects of retention interval and distinctiveness.
    Sauer JD; Weber N; Brewer N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):490-8. PubMed ID: 22441958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review.
    Johnston RA; Edmonds AJ
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):577-96. PubMed ID: 19548173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness.
    Little AC; Hancock PJ
    Br J Psychol; 2002 Nov; 93(Pt 4):451-64. PubMed ID: 12519528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Typicality and familiarity of faces.
    Bartlett JC; Hurry S; Thorley W
    Mem Cognit; 1984 May; 12(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 6472103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Face recognition as a function of judgments of likability/unlikability.
    Bruce AJ; McDonald BG
    J Gen Psychol; 1993 Oct; 120(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 8189210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.