These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16615386)

  • 1. Associative and causal reasoning accounts of causal induction: symmetries and asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic inferences.
    López FJ; Cobos PL; Caño A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1388-98. PubMed ID: 16615386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition.
    Waldmann MR; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Jun; 121(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 1534834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning.
    Waldmann MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):53-76. PubMed ID: 10682290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: evidence from an overshadowing paradigm.
    Waldmann MR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):600-8. PubMed ID: 11700912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanisms of predictive and diagnostic causal induction.
    Cobos PL; López FJ; Caño A; Almaraz J; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):331-46. PubMed ID: 12395491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferential dependencies in causal inference: a comparison of belief-distribution and associative approaches.
    Carroll CD; Cheng PW; Lu H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):845-63. PubMed ID: 22963188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. People want to see information that will help them make valid inferences in human causal learning.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1133-9. PubMed ID: 17128611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events.
    Cobos PL; López FJ; Luque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 17366306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of learning data in causal reasoning about observations and interventions.
    Meder B; Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 19246341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causal relations and feature similarity in children's inductive reasoning.
    Hayes BK; Thompson SP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):470-84. PubMed ID: 17696694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The engine of thought is a hybrid: roles of associative and structured knowledge in reasoning.
    Bright AK; Feeney A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Dec; 143(6):2082-102. PubMed ID: 25199040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Don't throw the associative baby out with the Bayesian bathwater: Children are more associative when reasoning retrospectively under information processing demands.
    Benton DT; Kamper D; Beaton RM; Sobel DM
    Dev Sci; 2024 May; 27(3):e13464. PubMed ID: 38059682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associative foundation of causal learning in rats.
    Polack CW; McConnell BL; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2013 Mar; 41(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 22562460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining whether causal order affects cue selection in human contingency learning: comments on Shanks and Lopez (1996).
    Waldmann MR; Holyoak KJ
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 9046875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.
    Mitchell CJ; Killedar A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 16248728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The special status of actions in causal reasoning in rats.
    Leising KJ; Wong J; Waldmann MR; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):514-27. PubMed ID: 18729713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.