These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16616602)
1. High frequency nonlinear scattering from a micrometer to submicrometer sized lipid encapsulated contrast agent. Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; de Jong N; van der Steen AF Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 32(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 16616602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonlinear intravascular ultrasound contrast imaging. Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; de Jong N; van der Steen AF Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 32(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 16616596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of binding on the subharmonic emissions from individual lipid-encapsulated microbubbles at transmit frequencies of 11 and 25 MHz. Helfield BL; Cherin E; Foster FS; Goertz DE Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 39(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 23219039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental acoustic characterization of an endoskeletal antibubble contrast agent: First results. Panfilova A; Chen P; van Sloun RJG; Wijkstra H; Postema M; Poortinga AT; Mischi M Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6765-6780. PubMed ID: 34580883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High frequency nonlinear B-scan imaging of microbubble contrast agents. Goertz DE; Cherin E; Needles A; Karshafian R; Brown AS; Burns PN; Foster FS IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Jan; 52(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 15742563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions. Halldorsdottir VG; Dave JK; Leodore LM; Eisenbrey JR; Park S; Hall AL; Thomenius K; Forsberg F Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Jul; 33(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 21842580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of self-demodulation on the subharmonic response of contrast agent microbubbles. Daeichin V; Faez T; Renaud G; Bosch JG; van der Steen AF; de Jong N Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3675-91. PubMed ID: 22614693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating the subharmonic response of individual phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies: a comparative study of five agents. Helfield BL; Cherin E; Foster FS; Goertz DE Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 May; 38(5):846-63. PubMed ID: 22402024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles. Faez T; Renaud G; Defontaine M; Calle S; de Jong N Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6459-73. PubMed ID: 21934190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phantom evaluation of stacked-type dual-frequency 1-3 composite transducers: A feasibility study on intracavitary acoustic angiography. Kim J; Li S; Kasoji S; Dayton PA; Jiang X Ultrasonics; 2015 Dec; 63():7-15. PubMed ID: 26112426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resonance frequencies of lipid-shelled microbubbles in the regime of nonlinear oscillations. Doinikov AA; Haac JF; Dayton PA Ultrasonics; 2009 Feb; 49(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 18977009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast imaging by non-overlapping dual frequency band transmit pulse complexes. Hansen R; Angelsen BA IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Feb; 58(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 21342814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound contrast imaging: influence of scatterer motion in multi-pulse techniques. Lin F; Cachard C; Mori R; Varray F; Guidi F; Basset O IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2065-78. PubMed ID: 24081255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction. Chomas JE; Dayton P; Allen J; Morgan K; Ferrara KW IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Jan; 48(1):232-48. PubMed ID: 11367791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic characterization of single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. Sijl J; Gaud E; Frinking PJ; Arditi M; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):4091-7. PubMed ID: 19206831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents. de Jong N; Emmer M; van Wamel A; Versluis M Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Aug; 47(8):861-73. PubMed ID: 19468770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-high-frequency ultrasound excitation on microbubble destruction volume. Shen CC; Su SY; Cheng CH; Yeh CK Ultrasonics; 2010 Jun; 50(7):698-703. PubMed ID: 20193957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonlinear propagation of ultrasound through microbubble contrast agents and implications for imaging. Tang MX; Eckersley RJ IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Dec; 53(12):2406-15. PubMed ID: 17186923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "Compression-only" behavior: a second-order nonlinear response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. Sijl J; Overvelde M; Dollet B; Garbin V; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):1729-39. PubMed ID: 21476630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]