257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16616910)
1. No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks.
Robbins R; McKone E
Cognition; 2007 Apr; 103(1):34-79. PubMed ID: 16616910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: reply to Gauthier & Bukach.
McKone E; Robbins R
Cognition; 2007 May; 103(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 16842769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should we reject the expertise hypothesis?
Gauthier I; Bukach C
Cognition; 2007 May; 103(2):322-30. PubMed ID: 16780825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early maturity of face recognition: no childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space.
Crookes K; McKone E
Cognition; 2009 May; 111(2):219-47. PubMed ID: 19296930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
McKone E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise.
Xu Y; Liu J; Kanwisher N
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):588-97. PubMed ID: 15716149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory recognition expertise and domain specificity.
Chartrand JP; Peretz I; Belin P
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():191-8. PubMed ID: 18299121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the Williams syndrome face-processing debate: the importance of building developmental trajectories.
Karmiloff-Smith A; Thomas M; Annaz D; Humphreys K; Ewing S; Brace N; Duuren M; Pike G; Grice S; Campbell R
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Oct; 45(7):1258-74. PubMed ID: 15335346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isolating the special component of face recognition: peripheral identification and a Mooney face.
McKone E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):181-97. PubMed ID: 14736306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts.
Busey TA; Vanderkolk JR
Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):431-48. PubMed ID: 15610748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inversion Impairs Expert Budgerigar Identity Recognition: A Face-Like Effect for a Nonface Object of Expertise.
Campbell A; Tanaka JW
Perception; 2018 Jun; 47(6):647-659. PubMed ID: 29690836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term expertise with artificial objects increases visual competition with early face categorization processes.
Rossion B; Collins D; Goffaux V; Curran T
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):543-55. PubMed ID: 17335400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Specialized face perception mechanisms extract both part and spacing information: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia.
Yovel G; Duchaine B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):580-93. PubMed ID: 16768361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Holistic processing for faces and cars in preschool-aged children and adults: evidence from the composite effect.
Cassia VM; Picozzi M; Kuefner D; Bricolo E; Turati C
Dev Sci; 2009 Mar; 12(2):236-48. PubMed ID: 19143797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiological neural mechanisms for detection, configural analysis and recognition of faces.
Anaki D; Zion-Golumbic E; Bentin S
Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1407-16. PubMed ID: 17689102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative case study of face recognition: the contribution of configural and part-based recognition systems, and their interaction.
Rivest J; Moscovitch M; Black S
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2798-811. PubMed ID: 19524599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Event-related potentials reflect heterogeneity of developmental prosopagnosia.
Minnebusch DA; Suchan B; Ramon M; Daum I
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 25(7):2234-47. PubMed ID: 17439500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?
McKone E; Kanwisher N; Duchaine BC
Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Jan; 11(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 17129746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The deleterious effect of contrast reversal on recognition is unique to faces, not objects.
Nederhouser M; Yue X; Mangini MC; Biederman I
Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(16):2134-42. PubMed ID: 17562344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of inversion on 3- to 5-year-olds' recognition of face and nonface visual objects.
Picozzi M; Cassia VM; Turati C; Vescovo E
J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Apr; 102(4):487-502. PubMed ID: 19111316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
