These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16616993)

  • 1. Further tests of the Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a temporal bisection task.
    Machado A; Arantes J
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 16616993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a successive temporal bisection task.
    Arantes J
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 18280059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context effect in a temporal bisection task with the choice keys available during the sample.
    Oliveira L; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 19162143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the scalar expectancy theory (SET) and the learning-to-time model (LeT) in a double bisection task.
    Machado A; Pata P
    Learn Behav; 2005 Feb; 33(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 15971498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Context effects in a temporal discrimination task" further tests of the Scalar Expectancy Theory and Learning-to-Time models.
    Arantes J; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jul; 90(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 18683611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The context effect as interaction of temporal generalization gradients: testing the fundamental assumptions of the Learning-to-Time model.
    Vieira de Castro AC; Machado A; Tomanari GY
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():18-30. PubMed ID: 23410903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acquisition versus steady state in the time-left experiment.
    Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16343806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning in the temporal bisection task: Relative or absolute?
    de Carvalho MP; Machado A; Tonneau F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 26752233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Representation of time intervals in a double bisection task: relative or absolute?
    Maia S; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 19022356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative versus absolute stimulus control in the temporal bisection task.
    Pinheiro de Carvalho M; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jul; 98(1):23-44. PubMed ID: 22851790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interaction of temporal generalization gradients predicts the context effect.
    de Castro AC; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 May; 97(3):263-79. PubMed ID: 22693358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Duration ratio discrimination in pigeons: a criterion-setting analysis.
    Fetterman JG
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):330-5. PubMed ID: 16343807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expectancy mediation of concurrent conditional discriminations.
    Peterson GB; Trapold MA
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 7168456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Categorical scaling of time: implications for clock-counter models.
    Fetterman JG; Killeen PR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1995 Jan; 21(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 7844506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence that pigeons represent both time and number on a logarithmic scale.
    Roberts WA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 16621331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal discrimination learning by pigeons.
    Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 17110057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event.
    Aum S; Brown BL; Hemmes NS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 17157998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of training delays and start and stop markers on the choose-short effect in pigeons.
    Talarico DC; Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):98-106. PubMed ID: 16095850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective timing in pigeons: Isolating temporal perception in the time-left procedure.
    Vieira de Castro AC; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):490-9. PubMed ID: 20176092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time left: linear versus logarithmic subjective time.
    Gibbon J; Church RM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):87-107. PubMed ID: 7241054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.