BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16617312)

  • 1. Can aneroid sphygmomanometers be used at altitude?
    Kametas NA; McAuliffe F; Krampl E; Nicolaides KH; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 16617312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring.
    Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Nasothimiou EG; Protogerou AD
    J Hum Hypertens; 2008 Nov; 22(11):796-800. PubMed ID: 18596720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    El Feghali RN; Topouchian JA; Pannier BM; El Assaad HA; Asmar RG;
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 17496467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
    Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Maxi Stabil 3: validation of an aneroid device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol.
    Reinders A; Jones CR; Cuckson AC; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Apr; 8(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 12819560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' blood pressure measurement device in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.
    Reinders A; Cuckson AC; Jones CR; Poet R; O'Sullivan G; Shennan AH
    BJOG; 2003 Feb; 110(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12618156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Nasothimiou EG; Karpettas N; Protogerou A
    J Hum Hypertens; 2010 Mar; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 19609285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population.
    Reinders A; Reggiori F; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 16932038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Nissei DS-400 in a low-resource setting.
    Duhig KE; De Greeff A; Van Der Westhuizen A; Baker E; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):132-5. PubMed ID: 19433979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of A&D UA-85X device for blood pressure measurement.
    Bonso E; Ragazzo F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 19020424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A self-measurement device suitable for hospital use: validation of the Spengler Pro M according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    de Greeff A; Ahmed N; Sheppard E; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 18496298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
    Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
    Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Gkinos CP; Patouras JD
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 17496469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II.
    Tasker F; de Greeff A; Liu B; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 19417636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement.
    Dorigatti F; Bonso E; Zanier A; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17303985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
    Jones CR; Taylor K; Poston L; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2001 Mar; 15(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11317204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.