245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16617535)
1. Essentially Yours: The Protection of Human Genetic Information in Australia--the impact on clinical practice and the 'new genetics'.
Trent RJ
Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):807-12. PubMed ID: 16617535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Essentially yours: the protection of human genetic information in Australia.
Otlowski M
Genewatch; 2006; 19(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 16789301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Worth waiting for.
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7321):134. PubMed ID: 21068784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic discrimination. Long-awaited genetic nondiscrimination bill headed for easy passage.
Holden C
Science; 2007 May; 316(5825):676. PubMed ID: 17478690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetics in the courtroom.
Black M
Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):755-63. PubMed ID: 16617529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of genetic testing: discrimination in life insurance and future directions.
Mould A
J Law Med; 2003 May; 10(4):470-87. PubMed ID: 12852320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic information and the importance of context: implications for the social meaning of genetic information and individual identity.
Gatter KM
St Louis Univ Law J; 2003; 47(2):423-62. PubMed ID: 15478258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human Genetics Commission calls for tougher rules on use and storage of genetic data.
Human Genetics Commission
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 14964203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Australian joint inquiry into the Protection of Human Genetic Information.
Weisbrot D
New Genet Soc; 2003 Apr; 22(1):89-113. PubMed ID: 15282907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breaking the stalemate: a prospective regulatory framework for unforseen research uses of human tissue samples and health information.
Greely HT
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1999; 34(3):737-66. PubMed ID: 12664910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic discrimination: meeting the challenges of an emerging issue.
Otlowski M
Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):764-9. PubMed ID: 16617530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hope fear and genetics: judicial responses to biotechnology.
Gold ER
Judicature; 1999; 83(3):132-8. PubMed ID: 12737164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic privacy. Japan guidelines under fire after protest halts study.
Normile D
Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5636):1039. PubMed ID: 12933990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic testing and discrimination: how private is your information?
Slaughter LM
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2006; 17(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17165231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Epidemiology, quality control and consumer access in the medical marketplace: the changing landscape of human genetic technology regulation in Australia.
Savard J
J Law Med; 2013 Mar; 20(3):595-603. PubMed ID: 23600191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genes and disability: questions at the crossroads.
Crossley M; Shepherd L
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 30(2):xi-xxiii. PubMed ID: 15083827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Safeguarding human genetic privacy.
Judicature; 2003; 86(5):224. PubMed ID: 15744895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Navajo Nation reconsiders ban on genetic research.
Reardon S
Nature; 2017 Oct; 550(7675):165-166. PubMed ID: 29022929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. UK insurers oppose moratorium plea on use of genetic data.
Masood E
Nature; 1998 Jan; 391(6662):3. PubMed ID: 9422496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ending the genetic discrimination barrier: regaining confidence in preconception, prenatal, and neonatal genetic testing.
Lovejoy W
South Calif Law Rev; 2001 Mar; 74(3):873-901. PubMed ID: 16437819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
