111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16617563)
41. Invasive carcinomas and fibroadenomas of the breast: comparison of microvessel distributions--implications for imaging modalities.
Weind KL; Maier CF; Rutt BK; Moussa M
Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):477-83. PubMed ID: 9680579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent-initial experience.
Moon WK; Im JG; Noh DY; Han MC
Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):240-6. PubMed ID: 11012451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
Gao JX; Yu XQ; Yao LH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Dynamic assessment of contrast medium enhancement in Doppler ultrasound imaging. Current status].
Huber S; Delorme S; Zuna I
Radiologe; 1998 May; 38(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 9646345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The usefulness of Doppler angiography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Debniak B; Debniak T; Breborowicz GH; Dubiel M
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004; 49(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 15303315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Computer-assisted quantitative assessment of power Doppler US: effects of microbubble contrast agent in the differentiation of breast tumors.
Kettenbach J; Helbich TH; Huber S; Zuna I; Dock W
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 53(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15664287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Characterization of focal liver lesions in real time using harmonic imaging with high mechanical index and contrast agent levovist.
Migaleddu V; Virgilio G; Turilli D; Conti M; Campisi G; Canu N; Sirigu D; Vincentelli I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15149997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A role for elastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions by measuring the maximum fat lesion ratio (max-FLR) by tissue Doppler imaging.
Ikeda K; Ogawa Y; Takii M; Sugano K; Ikeya T; Tokunaga S; Nishiguchi Y; Ikehara T
Breast Cancer; 2012 Jan; 19(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 21567172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Can different regions of interest influence the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced sonography?
Li J; Guo L; Yin L; Fang H; Ye W; Zhao B; Liu Y; Xu T
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():1-6. PubMed ID: 30396640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Du J; Wang L; Wan CF; Hua J; Fang H; Chen J; Li FH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3890-9. PubMed ID: 23062280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Distinguishing benign and malignant lesions with time-signal intensity curve of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI scanning].
Yuan HM; Yu JQ; Chu ZG; Peng LQ
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Jul; 42(4):556-9. PubMed ID: 21866648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Video sequence compared to conventional freeze image documentation: a way to improve the sonographic assessment of breast lesions?
Földi M; Hanjalic-Beck A; Klar M; Seybold A; Mayer S; Saueressig U; Hasenburg A; Stickeler E; Watermann D
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Oct; 32(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 21294070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Native and signal-enhanced power Doppler sonography for characterization of liver lesions].
Strunk H; Stuckmann G; Fröhlich E; Textor J; Wilhelm K; Hortling N; Remig J
Rofo; 1998 Apr; 168(4):344-51. PubMed ID: 9589096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Breast cancer recurrence versus scar. Ultrasonographic differentiation using Levovist as the contrast medium].
Stuhrmann M; Schwarz T; Schietzel M
Ultraschall Med; 2001 Feb; 22(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 11253551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the blood flow in breast tumors using power Doppler ultrasound].
Deyle S; Jörn H; Schmid-Schönbein H; Rath W
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Dec; 29 Suppl 5():233-8. PubMed ID: 18773383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Dynamics of contrast enhancement in MR imaging and power Doppler ultrasonography of solid breast lesions.
Reinikainen H; Pääkkö E; Suramo I; Päivänsalo M; Jauhiainen J; Rissanen T
Acta Radiol; 2002 Sep; 43(5):492-500. PubMed ID: 12423460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Contrast enhanced power Doppler sonography: comparison of various administration forms of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist].
Kratzer W; Kächele V; Merkle E; Mason RA; Büchner M; von Tirpitz C; Pfeiffer M
Rofo; 2000 May; 172(5):443-8. PubMed ID: 10874971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI.
Tan SL; Rahmat K; Rozalli FI; Mohd-Shah MN; Aziz YF; Yip CH; Vijayananthan A; Ng KH
Clin Radiol; 2014 Jan; 69(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 24156797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The clinical significance of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor.
Wenhua D; Lijia L; Hui W; Wei Y; Li T
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2012 Jun; 63(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 22373958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
