119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16617588)
1. Interobserver variability in cytologic subclassification of squamous intraepithelial lesions--the Bethesda System vs. World Health Organization classification.
Pajtler M; Audy-Jurković S; Milicić-Juhas V; Staklenac B; Pauzar B
Coll Antropol; 2006 Mar; 30(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 16617588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the HSIL subclassification cytologically real and clinically justified?
Milicić-Juhas V; Pajtler M
Coll Antropol; 2010 Jun; 34(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 20698108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reproducibility of cytologic diagnosis: study of CRISAP Ile-de-France].
Barrès D; Bergeron C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Feb; 28(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 10758586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study (BIRST): a web-based assessment of the Bethesda 2001 System for classifying cervical cytology.
Sherman ME; Dasgupta A; Schiffman M; Nayar R; Solomon D
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 17186503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability in the classification of advanced colorectal adenomas.
Terry MB; Neugut AI; Bostick RM; Potter JD; Haile RW; Fenoglio-Preiser CM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jul; 11(7):660-3. PubMed ID: 12101114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cytological classification of precancer and cancer of the cervix uteri].
Agamova KA; Nikitina NI; Gosh TE; Tikhomirova EE; Gladunova ZD
Vopr Onkol; 1987; 33(5):54-9. PubMed ID: 3590668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of anal intraepithelial neoplasia.
Lytwyn A; Salit IE; Raboud J; Chapman W; Darragh T; Winkler B; Tinmouth J; Mahony JB; Sano M
Cancer; 2005 Apr; 103(7):1447-56. PubMed ID: 15726546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic reproducibility of Pap testing in two regions of Mexico: the need for quality control mechanisms.
de Ruíz PA; Lazcano Ponce EC; Duarte Torres R; Ruíz Juárez I; Martínez Cortez I
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):330-8. PubMed ID: 9041744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of digital images to evaluate the interobserver agreement on cervical smear readings in Italian cervical cancer screening.
Tinacci G; Biggeri A; Pellegrini A; Cariaggi MP; Schiboni ML; Confortini M
Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 20482719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: a reaffirmation.
Montgomery E; Bronner MP; Goldblum JR; Greenson JK; Haber MM; Hart J; Lamps LW; Lauwers GY; Lazenby AJ; Lewin DN; Robert ME; Toledano AY; Shyr Y; Washington K
Hum Pathol; 2001 Apr; 32(4):368-78. PubMed ID: 11331953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intralaboratory reproducibility of cervical cytology diagnoses in the external quality assurance scheme of the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy.
Sama D; Cotignoli T; Guerrini L; Maioli P; Sintoni C; Bucchi L
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Mar; 60(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 8774647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the cytologic diagnosis of normal and abnormal metaplastic squamous cells in pap smears.
Gupta DK; Komaromy-Hiller G; Raab SS; Nath ME
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(5):697-703. PubMed ID: 11575646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Poor interobserver agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett's esophagus biopsies.
Downs-Kelly E; Mendelin JE; Bennett AE; Castilla E; Henricks WH; Schoenfield L; Skacel M; Yerian L; Rice TW; Rybicki LA; Bronner MP; Goldblum JR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2333-40; quiz 2341. PubMed ID: 18671819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of current classifications of endometrial endometrioid glandular proliferations: further evidence supporting a simplified classification.
Ordi J; Bergeron C; Hardisson D; McCluggage WG; Hollema H; Felix A; Soslow RA; Oliva E; Tavassoli FA; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Wells M; Nogales FF
Histopathology; 2014 Jan; 64(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 24111732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Wentzensen N; Bergeron C; Cas F; Vinokurova S; von Knebel Doeberitz M
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 17186505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver variability in the cytological diagnosis of 1500 Papanicolaou stained cervical monolayer specimens.
Naujoks H; Strohmeier R; Bicker T; van Driel-Kulker AM; Knepfle CF; Ploem JS
Pathol Res Pract; 1990 Feb; 186(1):150-3. PubMed ID: 1690414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic concordance in gynecologic cytology].
Lazcano Ponce EC; de Ruiz PA; Martínez Arias C; Murguía Riechers L
Rev Invest Clin; 1997; 49(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9380963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Urothelial neoplasia of the urinary bladder--comparison of interobserver variability for WHO Classification 1972 with WHO/ISUP Consensus Classification 1998.
Mamoon N; Iqbal MA; Jamal S; Luqman M
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2006; 18(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 16977804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
