706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16617920)
1. JCAHO, unannounced: just-surveyed organizations share compliance tips.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Apr; 31(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 16617920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scoring definitions revised for all accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):5. PubMed ID: 11246634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. 2005 thresholds for Conditional Accreditation and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Nov; 24(11):3. PubMed ID: 15587168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Top standards compliance issues for 2012.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2013 Apr; 33(4):1, 13-9. PubMed ID: 23641555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Compliance data for the Joint Commission's 2003 National Patient Safety Goals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):12-3. PubMed ID: 15484657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Update: additional scoring changes for all 2009 accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Jun; 29(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 19579473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Top standards compliance issues for first half of 2008.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Mar; 29(3):6. PubMed ID: 19343994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What to know about JCAHO. Joint Commission survey process changing this year.
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2006 Mar; 19(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 16594493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Top compliance issues for all of 2003.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 May; 24(5):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 15168568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New accreditation participation requirement regarding organizations' adherence to quality report approved for all programs.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Mar; 25(3):4. PubMed ID: 16578958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Corrections to the 1997-98 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Behavioral Health Care (CAMBHC).
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(2):BHC1-4. PubMed ID: 10177135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Top compliance issues for first half of 2003.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Nov; 23(11):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 14635406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Update on ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):15-30. PubMed ID: 10182300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the full Periodic Performance Review (PPR), Option 1, Option 2, and Option 3.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):8-9. PubMed ID: 15484654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Unannounced survey process on track for full implementation in 2006.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jan; 25(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 16515353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Try these foolproof tips to be ready for JCAHO.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 May; 29(5):63-5. PubMed ID: 15162672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. JCAHO offers two alternative ways to fulfill the periodic performance review.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):1-5. PubMed ID: 14582373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Modifications to the Periodic Performance Review Acreditation Participation Requirement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):1, 3. PubMed ID: 15484651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Simplifying compliance activities.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Mar; 21(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 11270206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
