These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16618039)

  • 1. [Shortly about cohort studies].
    Ludvigsson JF
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Mar 22-28; 103(12):943-4. PubMed ID: 16618039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supplementary data collection with case-cohort analysis to address potential confounding in a cohort study of thromboembolism in oral contraceptive initiators matched on claims-based propensity scores.
    Eng PM; Seeger JD; Loughlin J; Clifford CR; Mentor S; Walker AM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Mar; 17(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 18215000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cohort studies: marching forward.
    Thadhani R; Tonelli M
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Sep; 1(5):1117-23. PubMed ID: 17699334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inflation of the type I error rate when a continuous confounding variable is categorized in logistic regression analyses.
    Austin PC; Brunner LJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1159-78. PubMed ID: 15057884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readers guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytical strategies to reduce confounding.
    Normand SL; Sykora K; Li P; Mamdani M; Rochon PA; Anderson GM
    BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7498):1021-3. PubMed ID: 15860831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.
    Månsson R; Joffe MM; Sun W; Hennessy S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 166(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 17504780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjustment for multiple cardiovascular risk factors using a summary risk score.
    Arbogast PG; Kaltenbach L; Ding H; Ray WA
    Epidemiology; 2008 Jan; 19(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18091000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The limitations of statistical adjustment.
    Sainani K
    PM R; 2011 Sep; 3(9):868-72. PubMed ID: 21944304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Case-cohort designs and analysis for clustered failure time data.
    Lu SE; Shih JH
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1138-48. PubMed ID: 17156289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Common errors in analysis of the relationship between variables].
    Moczko JA
    Przegl Lek; 2006; 63(10):1153-8. PubMed ID: 17288244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confounding: propensity score adjustment.
    Fitzmaurice G
    Nutrition; 2006; 22(11-12):1214-6. PubMed ID: 17095408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misuses of correlation and regression analyses in orthodontic research: the problem of mathematical coupling.
    Tu YK; Nelson-Moon ZL; Gilthorpe MS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 16849074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors for benign thyroid disease.
    Knudsen N
    Dan Med Bull; 2005 Dec; 52(4):160-85. PubMed ID: 16764049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causal interpretation based on DAGs.
    Suzuki E; Komatsu H; Yorifuji T; Tsuda T
    Epidemiology; 2008 Mar; 19(2):361; author reply 361-2. PubMed ID: 18277177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal structural models for estimating effect modification.
    Chiba Y; Azuma K; Okumura J
    Ann Epidemiol; 2009 May; 19(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 19362275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies.
    Groenwold RH; Hak E; Hoes AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18619797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders.
    Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 167(5):523-9; discussion 530-1. PubMed ID: 18227100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regression modelling and other methods to control confounding.
    McNamee R
    Occup Environ Med; 2005 Jul; 62(7):500-6, 472. PubMed ID: 15961628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment and control of confounding in trauma research.
    Kurth T; Sonis J
    J Trauma Stress; 2007 Oct; 20(5):807-20. PubMed ID: 17955531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A statistical test for the equality of differently adjusted incidence rate ratios.
    Hoffmann K; Pischon T; Schulz M; Schulze MB; Ray J; Boeing H
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 167(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 18230678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.