199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16618369)
1. Allele frequency misspecification: effect on power and Type I error of model-dependent linkage analysis of quantitative traits under random ascertainment.
Mandal DM; Sorant AJ; Atwood LD; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
BMC Genet; 2006 Apr; 7():21. PubMed ID: 16618369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Type I error rates in association versus joint linkage/association tests in related individuals.
Kent JW; Dyer TD; Göring HH; Blangero J
Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 17219375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the type I error rate of model-free linkage analysis.
Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Elston RC; Weissbecker K; Keats BJ; Bailey-Wilson JE
Hum Hered; 2000; 50(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 10799971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of marker allele frequency misspecification in variance components quantitative trait locus analysis using sibship data.
Borecki IB; Province MA
Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S73-7. PubMed ID: 10597415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing.
Boyles AL; Scott WK; Martin ER; Schmidt S; Li YJ; Ashley-Koch A; Bass MP; Schmidt M; Pericak-Vance MA; Speer MC; Hauser ER
Hum Hered; 2005; 59(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 16093727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic linkage methods for quantitative traits.
Amos CI; de Andrade M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Feb; 10(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 11329691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of linkage-disequilibrium methods for localization of genes influencing quantitative traits in humans.
Page GP; Amos CI
Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1194-205. PubMed ID: 10090905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robust LOD scores for variance component-based linkage analysis.
Blangero J; Williams JT; Almasy L
Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 11055364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guess LOD approach: sufficient conditions for robustness.
Williamson JA; Amos CI
Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 7607416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples.
Abecasis GR; Cookson WO; Cardon LR
Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1463-74. PubMed ID: 11349228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.
Sham PC; Cherny SS; Purcell S; Hewitt JK
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1616-30. PubMed ID: 10762547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of misspecification of gene frequency on the two-point LOD score.
Pal DK; Durner M; Greenberg DA
Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Nov; 9(11):855-9. PubMed ID: 11781703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.
Douglas JA; Boehnke M; Lange K
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1287-97. PubMed ID: 10739757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.
Greenberg DA; Abreu PC
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 11754466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of misspecifying allele frequencies in incompletely typed families.
Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 8314036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robustness and power of the maximum-likelihood-binomial and maximum-likelihood-score methods, in multipoint linkage analysis of affected-sibship data.
Abel L; Müller-Myhsok B
Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Aug; 63(2):638-47. PubMed ID: 9683590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a multipoint identity-by-descent method with parametric multipoint linkage analysis for mapping quantitative traits.
Goldgar DE; Oniki RS
Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Mar; 50(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 1539596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prior segregation analysis and the power to detect linkage.
Atwood LD; Slifer SH
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):755-60. PubMed ID: 9433573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
