BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16618546)

  • 1. A new attachment for proximal segment positioning for bimaxillary dysgnathic surgery--technical note.
    Iida S; Reuther T; Aikawa T; Sakai T; Okura M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 34(4):217-9. PubMed ID: 16618546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple method for bone positioning of mandibular segments.
    Tominaga K; Yoshioka I; Khanal A; Furuta N; Habu M; Fukuda J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):856-60. PubMed ID: 16697149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoperative awakening of the patient during orthognathic surgery: a method to prevent the condylar sag.
    Politi M; Toro C; Costa F; Polini F; Robiony M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 17174773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
    Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.
    Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The functional long-term results after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with and without a condylar positioning device.
    Gerressen M; Zadeh MD; Stockbrink G; Riediger D; Ghassemi A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 64(11):1624-30. PubMed ID: 17052588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of anterior fixation alone in Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Gibbons AJ; Cousley R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 65(4):819; author reply 819. PubMed ID: 17368388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of an intermaxillary fixation screw for mandibular setback surgery.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1562-8. PubMed ID: 17656284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy with 2- versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA: part 3: inferior and anterior repositioning surgery.
    Erkmen E; Ataç MS; Yücel E; Kurt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 38(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 19046852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facial frontal morphological changes related to mandibular setback osteotomy using cephalograms.
    Amano K; Yagi T; Iida S; Aikawa T; Yamashiro T; Takada K; Kogo M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):412-6. PubMed ID: 19482484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of osteotomy fixation changing the number, the extension and the location of the plates.
    Trivellato AE; Passeri LA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 44(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 16263196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal stability following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with and without condylar positioning device.
    Gerressen M; Stockbrink G; Smeets R; Riediger D; Ghassemi A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7):1297-302. PubMed ID: 17577492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Condylar positioning devices for orthognathic surgery: a literature review.
    Costa F; Robiony M; Toro C; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 18417381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the mandibular reconstruction plate: technical innovation.
    Gregory GF; Gavin DV
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 2000 Apr; 45(2):120-1. PubMed ID: 10822921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical difficulties of removal of locking screw after locking compression plating.
    Bae JH; Oh JK; Oh CW; Hur CR
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Jan; 129(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 18931851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of maxillary positioning in bimaxillary surgery.
    Kretschmer WB; Zoder W; Baciut G; Bacuit M; Wangerin K
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 47(6):446-9. PubMed ID: 19577828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biodegradable fixation in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
    Coombes DM; Shelley MJ; McKenzie J; Sneddon KJ
    Dent Update; 2007 Dec; 34(10):641-4. PubMed ID: 18196829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel modification of a bone repositioning device and a new technique for reestablishing facial contours after mandibular resection surgery.
    Tominaga K; Yoshioka I; Yamashita Y; Habu M; Iwanaga K; Khanal A; Nishikawa T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 38(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 19272753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of the threaded and tapered locking reconstruction plates.
    Coletti DP; Caccamese JF; Norby C; Edwards S; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2587-93. PubMed ID: 18022489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.