70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16618636)
1. Familiarity seekers are fast and novelty seekers are slow.
Christie J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):312-25. PubMed ID: 16618636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel popout and familiar popout in a brightness discrimination task.
Diliberto KA; Altarriba J; Neill WT
Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1494-500. PubMed ID: 11143459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task.
Richmond J; Colombo M; Hayne H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 17723062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: further evidence for the semantic hypothesis.
Ghyselinck M; Custers R; Brysbaert M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):550-4. PubMed ID: 14979824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prioritization of looming and receding objects: equal slopes, different intercepts.
Skarratt PA; Cole GG; Gellatly AR
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):964-70. PubMed ID: 19429972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attention modulates perception of transparent motion.
Felisberti FM; Zanker JM
Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2587-99. PubMed ID: 16022880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
Roelofs A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal frequency modulates reaction time responses to first-order and second-order motion.
Hutchinson CV; Ledgeway T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1325-32. PubMed ID: 20718570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Familiarity does not affect the unilateral field advantage for repetition detection.
Butcher SJ; Cavanagh P
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1216-25. PubMed ID: 22532384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Where did that car come from?: Crossing the road when the traffic comes from an unfamiliar direction.
Johnston L; Peace V
Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Sep; 39(5):886-93. PubMed ID: 17270134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation of holistic processing in the time course of letter recognition.
Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 18586218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The perception of subjective contours and neon color spreading figures in young infants.
Kavsek M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):412-20. PubMed ID: 19304630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Object-intrinsic oddities draw early saccades.
Becker MW; Pashler H; Lubin J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17311476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fast pairs: a visual word recognition paradigm for measuring entrenchment, top-down effects, and subjective phenomenology.
Caldwell-Harris CL; Morris AL
Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1063-81. PubMed ID: 18948037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli.
Fouriezos G; Capstick G; Monette F; Bellemare C; Parkinson M; Dumoulin A
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 18266504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Presentation rate effects on paired associate learning by attention deficit disordered children.
Conte R; Kinsbourne M; Swanson J; Zirk H; Samuels M
Child Dev; 1986 Jun; 57(3):681-7. PubMed ID: 3720397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
Lu CH; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Letter-specific processing in children and adults matched for reading level.
Burgund ED; Abernathy AE
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18544449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
