These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16618636)
21. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention. Goolkasian P Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features. Shen J; Reingold EM Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):464-75. PubMed ID: 11414134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study. Dunlosky J; Ariel R J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):899-912. PubMed ID: 21480756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Familiarity and attention: does what we know affect what we notice? Christie J; Klein R Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):547-50. PubMed ID: 7476240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effects of advertisement location and familiarity on selective attention. Jessen TL; Rodway P Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Jun; 110(3 Pt 1):941-60. PubMed ID: 20681345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Wang Q; Cavanagh P; Green M Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 7991347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Verbal task demands are key in explaining the relationship between paired-associate learning and reading ability. Clayton FJ; Sears C; Davis A; Hulme C J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Jul; 171():46-54. PubMed ID: 29499432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of familiarity on visual-search performance: evidence for learned basic features. Malinowski P; Hübner R Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 11414133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interpreting infant looking: the event set x event set design. Bogartz RS; Shinskey JL; Speaker CJ Dev Psychol; 1997 May; 33(3):408-22. PubMed ID: 9149920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differential weighting of common and distinctive components. Ritov I; Gati I; Tversky A J Exp Psychol Gen; 1990 Mar; 119(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 2141061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fast visual generation: its nature and chronometrics. Boles DB Percept Psychophys; 1992 Mar; 51(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 1561049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Visual exploration in adults: Habituation, mere exposure, or optimal level of arousal? Gustafsson E; Francoeur C; Blanchette I; Sirois S Learn Behav; 2022 Jun; 50(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 34545534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. What Makes Tourist Experiences Interesting. Larsen S; Wolff K; Doran R; Øgaard T Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1603. PubMed ID: 31447718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Complexity, incongruity, pre-exposure and the familiarity effect in visual selection. Lemond IC Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Feb; 46(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 643504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]