132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16618849)
1. Conventional and indirect digital radiographic interpretation of oral unilocular radiolucent lesions.
Raitz R; Correa L; Curi M; Dib L; Fenyo-Pereira M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16618849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic interpretation of unilocular radiolucent mandibular lesions.
Raitz R; Correa L; Fenyo-Pereira M
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2009; 22(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 19839489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parameters in panoramic radiography for differentiation of radiolucent lesions.
Raitz R; Assunção Júnior JN; Correa L; Fenyo-Pereira M
J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 19936512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of using digital manipulation tools for diagnosing mandibular radiolucent lesions.
Raitz R; Assunção Junior JN; Fenyo-Pereira M; Correa L; de Lima LP
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Mar; 41(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 22116126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep learning neural networks to differentiate Stafne's bone cavity from pathological radiolucent lesions of the mandible in heterogeneous panoramic radiography.
Lee A; Kim MS; Han SS; Park P; Lee C; Yun JP
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254997. PubMed ID: 34283883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of panoramic radiography in assessing the dimensions of radiolucent jaw lesions with distinct or indistinct borders.
Chuenchompoonut V; Ida M; Honda E; Kurabayashi T; Sasaki T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 12775660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cysts and cystic lesions of the mandible: clinical and radiologic-histopathologic review.
Scholl RJ; Kellett HM; Neumann DP; Lurie AG
Radiographics; 1999; 19(5):1107-24. PubMed ID: 10489168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visualization of the superior and inferior borders of the mandibular canal: a comparative study using digital panoramic radiographs and cross-sectional computed tomography images.
Kamrun N; Tetsumura A; Nomura Y; Yamaguchi S; Baba O; Nakamura S; Watanabe H; Kurabayashi T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Apr; 115(4):550-7. PubMed ID: 23522648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Follicular/desmoplastic hybrid ameloblastoma with radiographic features of concomitant fibro-osseous and solitary cystic lesions.
Wakoh M; Harada T; Inoue T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):774-80. PubMed ID: 12464906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The x-ray picture of cysts and cyst-like neoplasms of the mandible].
Vorob'ev IuI; Truten' VP
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1994; 73(4):21-4. PubMed ID: 7732524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Case report. Diagnosis and management of an anterior lingual mandibular salivary gland defect.
Thomas LP; Abramovitch K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 9084275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the inferior alveolar canal for cysts and tumors of the mandible-comparison of multidetector computed tomography and 3-dimensional volume interpolated breath-hold examination magnetic resonance sequence with curved multiplanar reformatted reconstructions.
Srinivasan K; Seith A; Gadodia A; Sharma R; Kumar A; Roychoudhury A; Bhutia O
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):2327-32. PubMed ID: 22265163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphodigital evaluation of the trabecular bone pattern in the mandible using digitized panoramic and periapical radiographs.
Aranha Watanabe PC; Moreira Lopes De Faria L; Mardegan Issa JP; Caldeira Monteiro SA; Tiossi R
Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):73-80. PubMed ID: 19357613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical and radiographic analysis of 56 cases of mural ameloblastoma].
Wu Y; Yu S; Zhang Z
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Sep; 30(5):263-5, 319. PubMed ID: 8728962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An assessment of the aggressive potential of radiolucencies related to the mandibular molar teeth.
O'Reilly M; O'Reilly P; Todd CE; Altman K; Schafler K
Clin Radiol; 2000 Apr; 55(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 10767189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of digital and film panoramic radiographs for assessment of position and morphology of mandibular third molars and prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies.
Benediktsdottir IS; Hintze H; Petersen JK; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 12775665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic detection and classification of radiolucent lesions in the mandible on panoramic radiographs using a deep learning object detection technique.
Ariji Y; Yanashita Y; Kutsuna S; Muramatsu C; Fukuda M; Kise Y; Nozawa M; Kuwada C; Fujita H; Katsumata A; Ariji E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Oct; 128(4):424-430. PubMed ID: 31320299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
