These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16619412)

  • 1. Our new Promethean gift.
    Safire W
    Cerebrum; 2002; 4(3):54-5. PubMed ID: 16619412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mapping the future.
    Hall ZW
    Cerebrum; 2002; 4(3):72-6. PubMed ID: 16619420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No brainer--can we cope with the ethical ramifications of new knowledge of the human brain?
    Caplan A; Mobley W
    Cerebrum; 2002; 4(3):63. PubMed ID: 16619415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The age of neuroelectronics.
    Keiper A
    New Atlantis; 2006; 11():4-41. PubMed ID: 16789311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neuroethics: an agenda for neuroscience and society.
    Moreno JD
    Nat Rev Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 4(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 12563286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethics and the practice of brain science.
    Lo B; Albert MS; Hyman S; Parens E; Wolpe PR; Mobley W
    Cerebrum; 2002; 4(3):64-6. PubMed ID: 16619416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The challenges of neuroethics.
    Reichlin M
    Funct Neurol; 2007; 22(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 18182130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Drilling down in neuroethics.
    Baylis F; Downie J
    Bioethics; 2009 Jul; 23(6):iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19527259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DARPA on your mind.
    Moreno JD
    Cerebrum; 2004; 6(4):91-9. PubMed ID: 15986543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What can neuroscience contribute to ethics?
    Buller T
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Feb; 32(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 16446407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The risk that failed.
    Safire W
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Jul; ():A23. PubMed ID: 14515835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuroethical theories.
    Häyry M
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Apr; 19(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 20226100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remote control.
    Hoag H
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6942):796-8. PubMed ID: 12815397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain science and the self.
    Jonsen AR; Churchland PS; Damasio AR; Moreno J; Schaffner KF; Mobley W
    Cerebrum; 2002; 4(3):56-8. PubMed ID: 16619413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Straining their brains: why the case against enhancement is not persuasive.
    Caplan AL
    Cerebrum; 2004; 6(4):14-8. PubMed ID: 15986529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Knowing sin: making sure good science doesn't go bad.
    Greely HT
    Cerebrum; 2006 Jun; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 17120373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unrequited: neurochemical enhancement of love.
    Bamford R
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jul; 24(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 26059960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Italian neuroscientists are ready to start the debate.
    Conti F; Corbellini G
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7179):627. PubMed ID: 18256642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Silence of the neuroengineers.
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6942):787. PubMed ID: 12815385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cerebral organization for conscience and volition].
    Alonso de Florida F
    Gac Med Mex; 1980 Aug; 116(8):354-8. PubMed ID: 7439602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.